This study summarizes 23 field trials (over six geographic locations, with each trial composed of a separate field site and an application event) for quantifying the postapplication volatilization of dicamba from fields treated with an array of dicamba-containing formulations and tank adjuvants at an application rate of 0.56 or 1.12 kg dicamba acid equivalents (a.e.) per hectare (0.5 or 1.0 lb dicamba a.e. per acre). The data span 3 years of testing over a range of locations, field types, and environmental conditions. The aerodynamic and the integrated horizontal flux methodologies were employed (and then averaged) for estimating the vertical flux from the field for periods extending to approximately 72 h post application. In all cases, the vertical flux peaked within 24 h of application and then decayed to much lower levels by day 3. Total volatile losses among all formulations and conditions ranged from 0.023 ± 0.003 to 0.302 ± 0.045% of the applied dicamba (median = 0.08%). Analysis of the recorded meteorological and soil conditions for each field trial failed to identify any single soil or weather parameter as a dominant driver of total volatile losses. Air concentrations of dicamba observed in the course of these trials were all below the no observed adverse effect concentration for conventional soybean plant height or yield, indicating that air concentrations directly above or outside of the dicamba-treated area would not cause a reduction in plant height or yield of conventional soybean.

Quantitative assessment of the volatility of field applied herbicides requires orchestrated sampling logistics, robust analytical methods, and sophisticated modeling techniques. This manuscript describes a comprehensive system developed to measure dicamba volatility in an agricultural setting. Details about study design, sample collection, analytical chemistry, and flux modeling are described. A key component of the system is the interlaboratory validation of an analytical method for trace level detection (limit of quantitation of 1.0 ng/PUF) of dicamba in polyurethane foam (PUF) air samplers. Validation of field sampling and flux methodologies was conducted in a field trial that demonstrated agreement between predicted and directly measured dicamba air concentrations at a series of off-target locations. This validated system was applied to a field case study on two plots to demonstrate the utility of these methods under typical agricultural conditions. This case study resulted in a time-varying volatile flux profile, which showed that less than 0.2 ± 0.05% of the applied dicamba was volatilized over the 3-day sampling period.