Wound infection is a common and serious medical condition with an unmet need for improved diagnostic tools. A peptidomic approach, aided by mass spectrometry and bioinformatics, could provide novel means of identifying new peptide biomarkers for wound healing and infection assessment. Wound fluid is suitable for peptidomic analysis since it is both intimately tied to the wound environment and is readily available. In this study we investigate the peptidomes of wound fluids derived from surgical drainages following mastectomy and from wound dressings following facial skin grafting. By applying sorting algorithms and open source third party software to peptidomic label free tandem mass spectrometry data we provide an unbiased general methodology for analyzing and differentiating between peptidomes. We show that the wound fluid peptidomes of patients are highly individualized. However, differences emerge when grouping the patients depending on wound type. Furthermore, the abundance of peptides originating from documented antimicrobial regions of hemoglobin in infected wounds may contribute to an antimicrobial wound environment, as determined by in silico analysis. We validate our findings by compiling literature on peptide biomarkers and peptides of physiological significance and cross checking the results against our dataset, demonstrating that well-documented peptides of immunological significance are abundant in infected wounds, and originate from certain distinct regions in proteins such as hemoglobin and fibrinogen. Ultimately, we have demonstrated the power using sorting algorithms and open source software to help yield insights and visualize peptidomic data.
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
The advent of novel methods in mass spectrometry-based proteomics allows for the identification of biomarkers and biological pathways which are crucial for the understanding of complex diseases. However, contemporary analytical methods often omit essential information, such as protein abundance and protein co-regulation, and therefore miss crucial relationships in the data. Here, we introduce a generalized workflow that incorporates proteins, their abundances, and associated pathways into a deep learning-based methodology to improve biomarker identification and pathway analysis through the creation and interpretation of biologically informed neural networks (BINNs). We successfully employ BINNs to differentiate between two subphenotypes of septic acute kidney injury (AKI) and COVID-19 from the plasma proteome and utilize feature attribution-methods to introspect the networks to identify which proteins and pathways are important for distinguishing between subphenotypes. Compared to existing methods, BINNs achieved the highest predictive accuracy and revealed that metabolic processes were key to differentiating between septic AKI subphenotypes, while the immune system was more important to the classification of COVID-19 subphenotypes. The methodology behind creating, interpreting, and visualizing BINNs were implemented in a free and open source Python-package: https://github.com/InfectionMedicineProteomics/BINN.
Data independent acquisition mass spectrometry (DIA-MS) has recently emerged as an important method for the identification of blood-based biomarkers. However, the large search space required to identify novel biomarkers from the plasma proteome can introduce a high rate of false positives that compromise the accuracy of false discovery rates (FDR) using existing validation methods. We developed a generalized precursor scoring (GPS) method trained on 2.75 million precursors that can confidently control FDR while increasing the number of identified proteins in DIA-MS independent of the search space. We demonstrate how GPS can generalize to new data, increase protein identification rates, and increase the overall quantitative accuracy. Finally, we apply GPS to the identification of blood-based biomarkers and identify a panel of proteins that are highly accurate in discriminating between subphenotypes of septic acute kidney injury from undepleted plasma to showcase the utility of GPS in discovery DIA-MS proteomics.
Bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induces the rapid formation of protein aggregates in human wound fluid. We aimed to define such LPS-induced aggregates and the functional consequences of protein aggregation using a combination of mass spectrometry analyses, biochemical imaging, and experimental animal models. We show that such wound-fluid aggregates contain a multitude of protein classes, including sequences from coagulation factors, annexins, histones, antimicrobial proteins/peptides, and apolipoproteins. Proteins and peptides with a high aggregation propensity were identified, and selected components were verified biochemically by western blot analysis. Staining by thioflavin T and the Amytracker probe demonstrated the presence of amyloid-like aggregates formed after exposure to LPS in vitro in human wound fluid and in vivo in porcine wound models. Using NF-κB-reporter mice and IVIS bioimaging, we show that such wound-fluid LPS aggregates induce a significant reduction in local inflammation compared with LPS in plasma. The results show that protein/peptide aggregation is a mechanism for confining LPS and reducing inflammation and further underscore the connection between host defense and amyloidogenesis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.