We present a paediatric institutional experience with laparoscopic gastrostomies (LG) and evaluate its appropriateness as the recommended method for gastrostomy placement. We also sought to evaluate the efficacy of a simple technique for LG and collected information on long-term follow-up after LG. LG was performed in 112 children over a 6-year-period. The procedure involves visualization of the stomach through an umbilical port and a second epigastric gastrostomy site to select and anchor the stomach with sutures prior to the placement of a low profile gastrostomy feeding device (LPGD). The follow-up details of the patients were analysed. A review of literature was done to compare LG with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). The median operating time for the procedure in 112 patients was 48 min. There was one open conversion. Median postoperative length of stay was 6 days. Other complications were vomiting (11%), peri- gastrostomy leak (26%), granulation tissue (42%), accidental dislodgement of the LPGD (4%), faulty device requiring replacement (10%), gastric mucosal prolapse (2%) and localized infection (2%). Follow-up ranged from 6 to 75 months with a cumulative gastrostomy usage of 2,352 months. The advantages of the described technique are virtual feasibility in all patients, primary placement of a LPGD, simplicity with requirement of minimal laparoscopic expertise and safety. Comparison with reports of PEG in the literature indicates that LG should be the preferred method of gastrostomy placement in children.

The current Australian and New Zealand Burn Association (ANZBA) recommended Burns First Aid Treatment is place the burn under cool running water for 20 minutes. Wet towels and water spray also have been used frequently. No scientific data exist to compare the effectiveness of these methods of cooling. This study sought to determine experimental evidence for current Burns First Aid Treatment recommendations and the optimal mode of cooling. Four partial-thickness scald burn injuries were induced in 10 piglets each. First aid was then applied for 20 minutes via cool running water, wet towels, or water spray, with no treatment as a control. At day 1 and day 9, biopsies and clinical photographs were assessed in a blinded manner. The control group showed worsening or no change of depth over the course of 9 days. The outcomes with wet towels and water spray were variable. Cool running water consistently demonstrated improvement in wound recovery over the course of 9 days (P < .05). This study demonstrated that cool running water appeared the most effective first aid for an acute scald burn wound in a porcine model compared with wet towels and water spray.

The Australian and New Zealand Burn Association recommend 20 minutes of cold running tap water as burn first aid. Scientific evidence for the optimal duration of treatment is limited. Our aim was to establish the optimal duration of cooling using cold running tap water to treat the acute burn. Partial thickness contact scald burns were induced at five sites in each of 17 pigs. Treatments with cold running tap water for 5, 10, 20, and 30 minutes were randomly allocated to different sites together with an untreated control site. In the running water 5 and 10 minute treatments intradermal temperatures rose by 1 degrees C per minute when cooling was stopped, compared with 0.5 degrees C per minute for 20 and 30 minutes duration. No differences in the surface area of each burn were noted between the five treatments on day 9. Histological analysis of burn depth on days 1 and 9 revealed that a higher proportion of burns treated for 20 and 30 minutes showed improvement compared with those treated for 5 and 10 minutes only. This difference reached statistical significance (P < .05) only in the cold running water for 20 minutes treatment arm. There was a statistically significant (P < .05) improvement in burn depth in a porcine acute scald burn injury model when the burn was treated with cold running tap water for 20 minutes as opposed to the other treatment durations. This study supports the current burn first aid treatment recommendations for the optimal duration of cooling an acute scald burn.

Five extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants were treated in our institution for the milk curd syndrome, a milk bolus intestinal obstruction. The medical records of the five patients, who all underwent surgery, were retrospectively reviewed. History and examination are usually sufficient to diagnose the milk curd syndrome in ELBW infants. Confirmation with an abdominal X-ray may be possible but the X-ray findings may be mistaken for localised necrotising enterocolitis (NEC). Contrast enemas in an attempt to shift the bolus obstruction may be dangerous, and have a low success rate. Enterotomy and removal of the bolus is a safe and effective treatment if the diagnosis is early, otherwise resection with or without diverting ileostomy may be necessary. It appears that after years of disappearance, the milk curd syndrome has again become a clinical entity. It is probably due to a combination of high calcium and fat intake in an ever increasing population of ELBW infants.