Background Parkinson's disease is a progressive, disabling neurodegenerative disorder associated with significant economic burden for patients and caregivers. The objective of this study was to compare the direct and indirect economic burden of Parkinson's patients’ caregivers with demographically matched controls in the United States, in the 5 years after first diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. Methods Policyholders (18‐64 years old) linked to a Parkinson's disease patient (≥2 diagnoses of Parkinson's disease; first diagnosis is the index date) from January 1, 1998 to March 31, 2014, were selected from a private‐insurer claims database and categorized as Parkinson's caregivers. Eligible Parkinson's caregivers were matched 1:5 to policyholders with a non‐Parkinson's dependent (controls). Multivariable regression adjusted for baseline characteristics estimated direct costs (all‐cause insurer cost [medical and prescription] and comorbidity‐related medical costs; patient out‐of‐pocket costs) and indirect costs (disability and medically related absenteeism costs). Income progression was also compared between cohorts. Results A total of 1211 eligible Parkinson's caregivers (mean age, 56 years; 54% female) were matched to 6055 controls. In adjusted analyses, Parkinson's caregivers incurred significantly higher year 1 total all‐cause insurer costs ($8999 vs $7117) and medical costs ($7081 vs $5568) (both P < 0.01) and higher prescription costs (range for years 1‐5, $2506‐2573 vs $1405‐$1687) and total out‐of‐pocket costs ($1259‐1585 vs $902‐$1192) in years 1‐5 (all P < 0.01). Parkinson's caregivers had significantly higher adjusted indirect costs in years 1‐3 (range for years 1‐3, $2054‐$2464 vs $1681‐$1857; all P < 0.05) and higher cumulative income loss over 5 years ($5967 vs $2634 by year 5; P for interaction = 0.03). Conclusions Parkinson's caregivers exhibited higher direct and indirect costs and greater income loss compared with matched controls. © 2018 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society © 2018 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

BackgroundHormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HR+/HER2−) is the most common type of metastatic breast cancer (mBC). While mBC patients generally have poor prognosis with limited progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), those with multiple metastatic sites may have even worse clinical outcomes due to multiple organ involvement. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes including PFS, time on treatment (TOT), and OS between HR+/HER2− mBC patients with multiple metastases versus those with a single metastasis in a real-world clinical setting.MethodsThis was a retrospective chart review study of postmenopausal HR+/HER2− mBC women who had failed a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor in the adjuvant or metastatic setting and initiated a new treatment for mBC between 07/01/2012 and 04/15/2013. Patients were classified to one of two study groups (multiple metastases or single metastasis) based on the number of non-lymph-node metastases at the initiation of the new treatment. PFS, TOT and OS were compared between the two groups using Kaplan–Meier analyses and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for patient disease and treatment characteristics. Separate Cox models were conducted including models with an interaction term between line of therapy and study group to assess the impact of multiple metastases on clinical outcomes across different lines of therapy.ResultsA total of 699 patient charts were collected, including 291 patients with multiple metastases and 408 single metastasis patients. Worse performance status and a higher proportion of prior chemotherapy for mBC were observed among patients with multiple metastases. Overall, patients with multiple metastases had significantly shorter PFS [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.55, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.21–1.98], TOT (adjusted HR = 1.33, 95 % CI 1.05–1.67), and OS (adjusted HR = 1.77, 95 % CI 1.15–2.74) than single metastasis patients. Similar outcomes were observed in each line of therapy.ConclusionsAmong HR+/HER2− mBC patients, patients with multiple metastases had significantly shorter PFS, TOT, and OS than single metastasis patients, highlighting the substantial clinical burden and unmet need for more efficacious treatments for the former group of patients.

During the study period (1 January 2004 - 30 September 2012), most patients received <3 lines of ET before receiving CT. The drop in median duration of ET from first to second line suggests that single agent ETs might not be as effective beyond the first line. A key limitation of this study was the small sample size. In addition, more research is needed to further investigate the short treatment duration of fulvestrant across early lines of therapy (which could indicate lack of efficacy).

No abstract