Background: Limited early results indicate that the COVID-19 outbreak has had a significant impact on the mental health of children and adolescents. Pediatric emergency departments (PED) play a pivotal role in the identification, treatment, and coordination of care for children with mental health disorders, however, there is a dearth of literature evaluating the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health care provision in the PED. Objectives: We sought to evaluate whether changes in frequency or patient demographics among children and adolescents presenting to the PED has occurred. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study conducted at the Yale New Haven Children’s Hospital (YNHCH) PED. Data representing the early COVID-19 pandemic period was abstracted from the electronic medical record and compared using descriptive statistics to the same time period the year prior. Patient demographics including patient gender, ED disposition, mode of arrival, race-ethnicity, and insurance status were assessed. Results: During the pandemic period, 148 patients presented to the YNHCH PED with mental health-related diagnoses, compared to 378 in the pre-pandemic period, a reduction of 60.84%. Compared to white children, black children were 0.55 less likely to present with a mental health condition as compared to the pre-pandemic study period ( p = 0.002; 95% CI 0.36–0.85). Conclusions: Children with mental and behavioral health disorders who seek care in PEDs may be at risk for delayed presentations of mental health disorders. African American children may be a particularly vulnerable population to screen for mental health disorders as reopening procedures are initiated and warrants further study.

Introduction: Patient experience (PE) is an important aspect of the quality of medical care and is associated with positive health outcomes. In the pediatric emergency department (PED), PE is complicated due to the balance of needs between the patient and their family while receiving care. We identified an opportunity to improve our PE, as measured by a survey administered to patients and families following their visit to the PED. Methods: Utilizing quality improvement methods, we assembled a multidisciplinary team, developed our aims, and evaluated the process. We utilized a key driver diagram and run charts to track our performance. The team additionally monitored several essential subcategories in our improvement process. We aimed to improve our overall PE score from 86.1 to 89.7 over 9 months to align with institutional objectives. Results: Over 6 months, we improved our overall PE score from 86.1 to 89.8. Similarly, each of our subscores of interest (physician performance, things for patients to do in the waiting room, waiting time for radiology, staff sensitivity, and communication about delays) increased. Interventions included rounding in the waiting and examination rooms, staff training, team huddles, and a cross-department committee. All measures demonstrated sustained improvement. Conclusions: Even in this complex setting, a multidisciplinary team’s careful and rigorous process evaluation and improvement work can drive measurable PE improvement. We are continuing our efforts to further improve our performance in excellent patient-centered care to this critical population.

Introduction This cross-sectional study looked at the impact of the SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric emergency department (PED) attendances and admissions (as a proxy for severity of illness) in the United States and United Kingdom. Methods Data were extracted for children and adolescents, younger than 16 years, attending Royal Manchester Children's Hospital (RMCH, United Kingdom), and Yale New Haven Children's Hospital (YNHCH, United States). Attendances for weeks 1 to 20 of 2020 and 2019 were compared, and likelihood of admission was assessed via calculation of odds ratios, using week 13 (lockdown) as a cutoff. Results Attendance numbers for each PED decreased in 2020 compared with 2019 (RMCH, 29.2%; YNHCH, 24.8%). Odds of admission were significantly higher after lockdown than in 2019—RMCH (odds ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.08–1.46) and YNHCH (odds ratio, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.31–1.98). Conclusions Although the absolute numbers of children and adolescents attending the PED and being admitted decreased after lockdown, the acuity of illness of those attending appears to be higher.

No abstract

Introduction: Many children with behavioral health concerns increasingly utilize the emergency department for assessment and care. These visits are increasing in frequency, length, and cost, further stressing already limited resources. To improve the quality of care in this population, we developed a multidisciplinary improvement initiative to decrease the length of stay by 10% (from 5.2 hours), increase suicide screening to 90%, and improve patient and family experience by 10% (from 89.7). Methods: We leveraged a multidisciplinary team to map care processes, standardize suicide risk screening, optimize staffing, and develop a brochure to demystify patients’ and families’ visits. We developed dashboards and a call-back system following discharge to understand engagement in post-acute care plans. We utilized run charts to identify signals of nonrandom variation. Results: We reduced overall length of stay from 5.2 to 4 hours, improved patient experience scores from 89.7 to 93.2, and increased the suicidality screening rate from 0% to 94%. There was no change in the 72-hour return rate in this population. Conclusions: Engagement of a multidisciplinary team, with strategic implementation of improvements, measurably improved many aspects of care for pediatric patients with behavioral health crises in the emergency department setting. Recidivism, however, remains unchanged in this population and continues as a goal for future work.