No abstract

BackgroundThe Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is one of the most commonly used instruments in the evaluation of global cognitive status. Few studies have investigated the relationship among its components in terms of factorial structure in Japanese individuals suffering from dementia. The aims of this study were: 1) to analyze the factorial structure of MMSE in Japanese dementia patients, 2) to clarify the MMSE static structure in identifying different cognitive profiles and understanding how these profiles are related to levels of dysfunction in subsets of dementia patients.Methods30,895 consecutive outpatients with dementia were evaluated. The 11 subtests composing the MMSE and the global MMSE score were analyzed. Factor analysis based on principal component analysis with Promax rotation was applied to the data representing the frequency of failures in each subtest as identified by the MMSE.ResultsFactor analysis identified three factors that explained approximately 44.57% of the total variance. The first factor, immediate memory, essentially constituted a simple index of the reading and writing subtests. The second factor, orientation and delayed recall, expressed the ability to handle new information. The third factor, working memory, was most closely related to the severity of dementia at the time of test administration.ConclusionsJapanese dementia patients appear to develop difficulty handling new information in the early stages of their disease. This finding, and our finding that there is a factor associated with disease severity, suggest that understanding the specific factors related to subtest items, which underlie the total MMSE score may be useful to clinicians in planning interventions for Japanese patients in the early stages of dementia.

Summary. Background: Intron 22 inversion (Inv22) of the coagulation factor (F)VIII gene (F8) is a frequent cause of severe hemophilia A. In addition to Inv22, a variety of F8 mutations (1492 unique mutations) causing hemophilia A have been reported, of which 171 involve deletions of over 50 bp (HAMSTeRs database; http://hadb.org.uk/). However, only 10% of these large deletions have been fully characterized at the nucleotide level. Patients and methods: We investigated gene abnormalities in three unrelated severe hemophilia A patients with high titer FVIII inhibitors. They had previously been shown to carry large deletions of the F8, but the precise gene abnormalities remain to be elucidated. Results: Inverse shifting-PCR (IS-PCR) Inv22 diagnostic tests revealed that these patients carried either type I or II Inv22. However, they showed a wild-type (WT) pattern in the IS-PCR Inv22 complementary tests. We further analyzed their X chromosomes to account for the puzzling results, and found that they had different centromeric breakpoints in the Inv22 X chromosomes, adjacent to the palindromic regions containing int22h-2 or -3, and their spacer region, respectively. The connections appeared to be shifted towards the telomere of the WT F8 Xq28, resulting in a new telomere with an additional intact int22h copy. Conclusions: These gene rearrangements might result from double-strand breaks in the most distal regions of the long arms of the Inv22 X chromosomes, followed by DNA restorations using the WT F8 Xq28 by non-homologous end joining or break-induced replication; thus leading to large F8 deletions in severe hemophilia A patients.

Syndecan-4, a cell-surface heparan sulfate proteoglycan, can participate in inflammation and wound healing as a host defense molecule. Tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, one of the most potent proinflammatory cytokines, is known to upregulate syndecan-4 expression, but the precise mechanisms are unclear. To elucidate these mechanisms in detail, we examined syndecan-4 upregulation by TNF-α in the endothelium-like EAhy926 cell. Of the two putative nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) binding sites in the syndecan-4 gene (SDC4) promoter, deletion or mutation of one or both sites significantly diminished the effects of TNF-α. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays showed that p65 and c-Rel, but not p50, bound to these NF-κB binding sites, whereas pull-down assays showed binding of all three NF-κB components. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays clearly showed that p65 and phosphorylated p65, but not p50 or c-Rel, bound to the SDC4 promoter. An NF-κB inhibitor, p65 knockdown and a transcriptional elongation inhibitor completely blocked the effect of TNF-α on SDC4 promoter activity and significantly, but not completely, blocked that on SDC4 mRNA expression. These data suggest that NF-κB p65 could be a key mediator of syndecan-4 upregulation by TNF-α through two binding sites in the SDC4 promoter, but other NF-κB-p65 independent pathways might also be involved through transcriptional elongation.

No abstract