Introduction: Nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) lung disease (LD) is the most common clinical manifestation of NTM infection and is a growing health concern. Up to 85% of NTM-LD cases are caused by Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). Increased awareness of NTM-LD caused by MAC is needed as patients with this disease experience substantial burden and unmet treatment needs. Areas covered: This review provides clinicians and regulatory and healthcare decision makers an overview of the clinical, economic, and humanistic burden of NTM-LD and the unmet treatment needs faced by patients and clinicians. The review focuses on NTM-LD caused by MAC. A summary of the 2020 NTM guidelines specifically for MAC-LD and an overview of novel treatment options, including amikacin liposome inhalation suspension (ALIS) as the first approved therapy for refractory MAC-LD, and investigational drugs in testing phase are provided. Expert opinion: Key advancements in NTM-LD management include recent updates to clinical practice guidelines, approval of ALIS for the treatment of refractory MAC-LD, and ongoing clinical trials of investigational treatments. Yet opportunities still exist to improve patient outcomes, including development of better screening tools, such as reliable and responsive biomarkers to help identify high-risk patients, and addressing unmet treatment needs.

Objective Oral ulcers are the cardinal manifestation in Behçet’s disease (BD). The 2018 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations describe treatments for BD-associated oral ulcers with mucocutaneous involvement; however, little comparative effectiveness information for these agents is available. In the absence of head-to-head trials, an indirect treatment comparison (ITC) could provide useful evidence regarding comparative effectiveness of BD treatments. The purpose of this study was to conduct a comparative systematic literature review (SLR) and similarity assessment of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the oral ulcer-related efficacy outcomes of EULAR-recommended treatments for BD-associated oral ulcers to determine the feasibility of an ITC. Methods An SLR was performed to identify relevant RCTs indexed in MEDLINE/Embase before May 29, 2019. RCT similarities for the ITC were assessed based on a step-wise process recommended by the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. Results In total, 317 articles were identified, of which 14 RCTs, reflecting 11 EULAR-recommended treatments, were evaluated in a similarity assessment. Number of oral ulcers, resolution of oral ulcers, and healing time for oral ulcers were identified as the possible oral ulcer-related outcomes. After completing the similarity assessment of these outcomes, it was determined that a robust ITC was infeasible for the three oral ulcer-related outcomes due to heterogeneity in outcomes reporting, study design, and/or patient characteristics. More broadly, the results underscore the need for and consistent use of standardized measures for oral ulcer outcomes to facilitate comparative research. Conclusion In the absence of head-to-head RCTs and infeasibility of quantitative ITC, comparative assessments for BD-associated oral ulcers are limited, including comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness evaluations. Healthcare decision-makers must continue to base treatment decisions on the extent and strength of available evidence (eg, robust RCTs), clinical guidelines, real-world experience, and patient considerations.

No abstract