Cell-lineage-specific transcription factors are a group of regulatory proteins expressed in embryonic, differentiated, or neoplastic cells of the same lineage and represent a valuable repertoire of tissue-specific markers for the diagnosis of human tumors. Together with PAX2, PAX8 is a nephric-lineage transcription factor and is required for the establishment of renal-lineage cells and the formation of the kidney. In contrast to PAX2, little is known about the expression of PAX8 in adult kidney and renal tumors. In this study, we used immunohistochemistry to investigate the expression of PAX8 in adult human kidney and renal epithelial tumors. We report here that PAX8 was detected in renal epithelial cells in all segments of renal tubules from the proximal tubules to the renal papillae and in the parietal cells of Bowman's capsule in the adult kidney. PAX8 was also present in 98% of clear cell renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), 90% of papillary RCCs, and 95% of oncocytomas, similar to PAX2. In addition, PAX8 was found in 82% of chromophobe RCCs, 71% of sarcomatoid components of RCCs, and 100% (2/2) of renal medullary carcinomas. Overall, PAX8 was detected in 85% of metastatic renal tumors. Interestingly, expression of PAX8 was noted in some urothelial cells in the renal pelvis and ureters and B23% of urothelial carcinomas of the renal pelvis, but not in the urothelium or urothelial carcinomas of the urinary bladder; this probably underlines the different embryonic origins of urothelial cells in the upper and lower urinary tracts. As shown in this study, PAX8 is widely expressed in normal and neoplastic renal tissues. PAX8 may be a useful additional marker for renal epithelial tumors; however, its specificity and sensitivity await further investigation.

Recent evidence has showed that nephrogenic adenoma is a true "nephrogenic" lesion derived from the proliferation of exfoliated and implanted renal tubular cells in the urinary tract, a process that closely resembles the formation of endometriosis. This new concept has led to the identification of renal transcription factor PAX2 as a diagnostic marker for nephrogenic adenoma. PAX8 is another transcription factor structurally and functionally related to PAX2. Both are cell lineage restricted transcription factors expressed in normal and neoplastic tissues of related origin, including renal tubular cells in both fetal and adult kidneys. In this study, we investigated the expression of PAX8 in nephrogenic adenoma and its mimics. We report here that PAX8 was detected in all nephrogenic adenomas (N=35) and clear cell adenocarcinoma of the lower urinary tract (N=7), but not in prostate adenocarcinoma (N=100), adenocarcinoma (N=9), squamous cell carcinoma (N=5), or urothelial carcinoma (N=48) of the urinary bladder and its variants. PAX8 was neither detected in normal urothelium of the urinary bladder nor in prostate glands and stroma. PAX2 was also detected in 2 of the 7 clear cell adenocarcinomas of the lower urinary tract. We suggest that PAX8 is an additional marker for identifying nephrogenic adenoma. Expression of PAX8 or PAX2 in both nephrogenic adenoma and clear cell adenocarcinoma of the lower urinary tract may indicate a possible related tissue origin for these 2 lesions; both may be derived from proliferating renal tubular cells in the urinary tract. In addition, detection of PAX8 or PAX2 in clear cell adenocarcinoma of the lower urinary tract is helpful in differentiating it from urothelial carcinoma and its variants and adenocarcinomas of the urinary bladder or of the prostate.

Different patterns of bone marrow (BM) infiltration by diffuse large B cell lymphomas (DLBCL) have been described. A pure nodular pattern is uncommon, and the pathologic features, as well as the clinical correlates of DLBCL manifesting this pattern in the BM have not been well characterized. We evaluated BM biopsies involved by large B cell lymphomas diagnosed at our institute over an 11-year period to assess the morphology, phenotype, cytogenetic abnormalities, and clinical features of cases associated with a nodular pattern. A distinct nodular pattern of BM involvement was noted in 14 out of 55 (25%) cases. Although both EBV+ and EBV- DLBCL with this pattern were identified, a pure nodular pattern was significantly more common in EBV+ DLBCL compared to EBV- DLBCL (8/9, 89% versus 6/46, 13%; P = 0.00002). The majority of EBV+ DLBCL associated with a nodular pattern had distinctive morphologic features (polymorphic cellular infiltrate and pleomorphic cytology), and CD30 expression was more commonly observed in this group (P = 0.0163). All EBV+ DLBCL and two out of six (33%) EBV- DLBCL had nongerminal center phenotypes. No recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities were detected in either group. Importantly, all EBV+ DLBCL occurred in individuals with immune dysfunction (organ transplant recipients, HIV infection) or in those >50 years of age. Our study indicates a much higher predilection for EBV+ DLBCL to involve the marrow in a nodular pattern compared to EBV- cases and highlights similarities in the morphologic pattern of BM involvement by previously recognized subsets of immunodeficiency-related EBV + lymphomas and the newer entity of "EBV+ DLBCL of the elderly."