Summary Tumors are largely classified by histological appearance, yet morphological features do not necessarily predict cellular origin. To determine the origin of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA), we labeled and traced pancreatic cell populations after induction of a PDA-initiating Kras mutation. Our studies reveal that ductal and stem-like centroacinar cells are surprisingly refractory to oncogenic transformation, whereas acinar cells readily form PDA precursor lesions with ductal features. We show that formation of acinar-derived premalignant lesions depends on ectopic induction of the ductal gene Sox9. Moreover, when concomitantly expressed with oncogenic Kras, Sox9 accelerates formation of premalignant lesions. These results provide insight into the cellular origin of PDA and suggest that its precursors arise via induction of a duct-like state in acinar cells.

The factors necessary to maintain organ-specific progenitor cells are poorly understood and yet of extreme clinical importance. Here, we identify the transcription factor SOX9 as the first specific marker and maintenance factor of multipotential progenitors during pancreas organogenesis. In the developing pancreas, SOX9 expression is restricted to a mitotically active, Notch-responsive subset of PDX1 ؉ pluripotent progenitors and is absent from committed endocrine precursors or differentiated cells. Similar to Notch mutations, organ-specific Sox9 inactivation in mice causes severe pancreatic hypoplasia resulting from depletion of the progenitor cell pool. We show that Sox9 maintains pancreatic progenitors by stimulating their proliferation, survival, and persistence in an undifferentiated state. Our finding that SOX9 regulates the Notcheffector HES1 suggests a Notch-dependent mechanism and establishes a possible genetic link between SOX factors and Notch. These findings will be of major significance for the development of in vitro protocols for cell replacement therapies.

No abstract

Pygopus has recently been identified in Drosophila as an essential component of the nuclear complex required for canonical Wnt signaling. Here, we have investigated the role of the mammalian pygopus ortholog, mPygo2, in pancreas development. We show that a null mutation of mPygo2 in mice causes pancreas hypoplasia due to decreased progenitor cell proliferation after embryonic day (e) 12.5. During the same time window, mPygo2-deficient embryos begin to display a reduction in endocrine progenitors and consequently a decrease in islet endocrine cell mass. Consistent with its function after e12.5, late-developing endocrine cell types, such as beta, delta and PP cells, are specifically reduced, while the earlier-forming alpha cells develop normally. We find canonical Wnt signaling to be predominantly active in the mesenchyme at the time when mPygo2 is required and demonstrate the dependence of Wnt signal transduction on mPygo2. Furthermore, conditional deletion of mPygo2(flox) allele in the pancreatic epithelium does not phenocopy the defects in mPygo2-null mutants. Since mPygo2 is expressed in the pancreatic mesenchyme and the role of the mesenchyme in epithelial progenitor cell expansion is well documented, our findings suggest an indirect role for mPygo2 in epithelial growth and differentiation through regulation of mesenchymal signals. Together, our data suggest a previously unappreciated role for mesenchymal Wnt signaling in regulating pancreatic organ growth and cell differentiation.

T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT) is a co-inhibitory molecule containing an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif (ITIM) within its cytoplasmic tail, and is highly expressed on regulatory T cells and activated CD4+ T, CD8+ T, and NK cells. TIGIT competes with CD226, which contains an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) within its cytoplasmic tail for ligands poliovirus receptor (PVR) and poliovirus receptor-related 2 (PVRL2), with higher affinity to PVR. The ligands are expressed on the surface of antigen presenting cells and at high levels on most tumors. Therefore, when TIGIT is present, the ligands preferentially engage TIGIT rather than CD226, leading to cell suppression. We have generated antibodies against TIGIT that blocks ligand binding and inhibits TIGIT signaling. The clinical candidate, OMP-313M32 binds human TIGIT but not rodent and non-human primate TIGIT. Therefore, a surrogate antibody was generated for pre-clinical assessments in mice. Antibody 313R12 is an anti-mouse TIGIT antibody that can block mouse PVR ligand binding and inhibit TIGIT signaling in a manner similar to the clinical candidate OMP-313M32. 313R12 inhibited the growth of syngeneic colon and kidney tumors in immune competent mice. In some cases, anti-TIGIT antibody 313R12 caused complete tumor regression and a potent anti-tumor immune memory response as demonstrated by the lack of tumor growth upon re-challenge of mice that remained tumor-free after prior anti-TIGIT treatment. Mechanistically, anti-TIGIT antibody 313R12 was shown to induce a Th1 response and increase cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity. By in vivo depletion of T cell populations, we have shown that CD8 T cell depletion completely abrogated the anti-TIGIT therapeutic effect, whereas CD4 T cell depletion led to partial reversal of efficacy of anti-TIGIT. Therefore, both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are critical for anti-TIGIT-mediated immune responses. Using mice reconstituted with human hematopoietic stem cells, we also demonstrated that the clinical candidate OMP-313M32 inhibits patient-derived melanoma tumor growth. Taken together, these data demonstrate that anti-TIGIT therapy suppresses tumor growth and generates long-term immunological memory against multiple tumors. Citation Format: Angie Inkyung Park, Minu Srivastava, Erin Mayes, Hyun-Bae Jie, Rui Yun, Christopher Murriel, Ming-hong Xie, Andrew Lam, May Ji, Fumiko Axelrod, Jorge Monteon, John Lewicki, Tim Hoey, Austin Gurney. Antibody against TIGIT (T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains) induces anti-tumor immune response and generates long-term immune memory [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2003. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-2003