This paper examines how people with dwarfism1 are represented in the American animated sitcom Family Guy. Using autocritical discourse analysis, this paper reflects on my own response, as a person with dwarfism, to scenes featuring characters with dwarfism. Whilst the show has been criticised for its controversial humour, this paper argues that the show actually exposes negative social attitudes that people with dwarfism encounter from other members of the public while refraining from encouraging stereotypes of dwarfism. The paper builds upon Fink’s (2013) suggestion that animated comedies are a source of both humour and social commentary. This paper suggests that Family Guy has the potential to challenge social attitudes towards people with dwarfism and the way they are perceived in society through directing the humour towards those who mock them as opposed to those with dwarfism. However, how the scenes are interpreted depends on the audience, which can be related to Hall’s (1993) reception theory.

No abstract

Within Geography, the subject of body size is now gaining momentum, with a growing body of research, which focuses on how the sized body interacts with, and experiences spaces. There is some contention as to whether body sizes, which go beyond the norm, are disabled, which is often blamed on a lack of understanding of what disability is. This paper argues that spaces are disabling for different body sizes, due to the way they are constructed, and that spaces need to be made enabling in order to provide equal access for all. It is suggested that writers within geographies of body size could change focus from how spaces are disabling, to how spaces can become enabling for different body sizes, through engaging with the concept of universal design. The main aim of universal design is to accommodate for a range of different bodies, including different body sizes and thus providing equal access within the built environment.Within Geography, the subject of body size is now gaining momentum with a growing body of research, which focuses on how different body sizes 1 interact with, and experience spaces within the built environment, by which I mean urban spaces. In regard to urban spaces, they are spaces, which are manmade, and thus for economic reasons are created to specifically accommodate for the average person. Hopkins (2008: 2121) suggests that 'understanding how people negotiate everyday spaces, which are planned for specific bodies, is crucial in advancing the knowledges of geographies of body size'. If the size of a space or facility was not a contributing factor to a person's disablement, then there would be no need to ergonomically construct a space or facility for the average sized person. Bodies, which are not of a specific size, experience spaces differently, affecting their use of spaces as they are disabling. A lack of consideration for various body sizes demonstrates that bodily variations are not given equal access to the built environment and that there is scope to show how spaces can be made to accommodate for different body sizes. This paper aims to bring together literature regarding various body sizes, disability in relation to the built environment and Universal Design to show it how it can be a welcome concept within geographies of body size. Universal Design is based on the principle that there is only one population, comprised of individuals representing diverse characteristics and abilities (Iwarsson and Stahl 2003). Universal Design is defined asThe design of products and environments to be usable by all people, to the greatest extent possible, without the need for adaptation or specialized design (Mace 1985, in Steinfeld and Maisel 2012: 12).Universal Design emerged from the disability rights movement but with the aim of benefiting the wider population, including children (Steinfeld and Maisel 2012). Thus, under Universal Design, spaces are not only made accommodating for particular disabilities, also for different body sizes and thus creating a more accommodating built environment for a wid...

No abstract

No abstract