Purpose To report a case of a healthy, young male with recurrent herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) and high-dose l -arginine supplementation. Observations A 39-year-old man presented to another institution with a HZO involving the right eye. He was treated with oral acyclovir with complete resolution. Four months later the patient had a recurrent HZO episode and was started again on oral acyclovir. After resolution of the episode, the patient was continued on 1 g of oral acyclovir daily as a prophylactic measure. He then presented to our institution for a second opinion. The patient was otherwise healthy, with no past medical history involving systemic immunosuppressant agents or HIV. However, the patient was an active weight lifter taking high doses of amino acids. A diet recall was performed prior to both HZO episodes, which calculated an average intake of 46.5 g of l -arginine a day. Examination revealed 20/40 best-corrected acuity, anterior stromal haze in the visual axis, and inferior superficial punctate keratitis in the right eye. The patient was treated for dry eye disease with punctual plugs and artificial tears. The patient was instructed to decrease all supplemental arginine consumption while continuing with oral acyclovir prophylaxis for one year. Conclusions and importance l -arginine is associated with the replication and virulence of a variety of viruses in vitro, including herpes simplex and varicella zoster. Although arginine consumption increased prior to the initial and recurrent HZO infection, further investigation needs to be performed to deem if a true association exists.

No abstract

Purpose: To report a case of a patient with unilateral Adie’s pupil who underwent bilateral cataract extraction with multifocal and monofocal posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Methods: A 74-year-old woman presented to our institution complaining of worsening near vision. Gross examination revealed a 6-mm fixed pupil on the right eye (OD) and a 5-mm pupil reacting to 3 mm with light on the left eye (OS). Slit lamp examination revealed a tonic pupil with an exaggerated pupillary constriction to dilute pilocarpine OD. Dilated exam revealed 2–3+ nuclear and cortical lens changes bilaterally. The patient’s active lifestyle, personality, and biometry measurements made her a good candidate for multifocal IOL (MfIOL) implantation OS. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract extraction with a ReSTOR +3 ADD (SN60D1) implantation was performed OS. Monofocal lens implantation (SN60WF) was performed OD 6 months later. Results: One year postoperatively, our patient had an uncorrected visual acuity (VAsc) of 20/15 for distance and J10 for near OD. Her VAsc was 20/25 +1 for distance and J1 for near OS. Visual acuity when using both eyes was 20/15 for distance and J1 for near. Conclusion: Optimizing success for MfIOL implantation is a multifactorial process. Large pupils preoperatively are of particular concern, as this may lead to increased dysphotopsia with pupil-dependent MfIOLs. Thus, patients with unilateral mydriasis, such as Aide’s pupil, may have a beneficial outcome combining multifocal-monofocal implantation after bilateral cataract extraction, especially if they are not a candidate for monovision but desire spectacle independence.