No abstract

To evaluate the localization of responses to stimulation of the periodontal mechanoreceptors in the primary somatosensory cortex, somatosensory evoked fields (SEFs) were measured for stimulation of the left mandibular canine and first molar using magnetoencephalography in 25 healthy subjects. Tactile stimulation used a handmade stimulus device which recorded the trigger at the moment of touching the teeth.SEFs for the canine and first molar were detected in 20 and 19 subjects, respectively. Both responses were detected in the bilateral hemispheres. The latency for the canine was 62.1 AE 12.9 ms in the ipsilateral hemisphere and 65.9 AE 14.8 ms in the contralateral hemisphere. The latency for the first molar was 47.4 AE 6.6 ms in the ipsilateral hemisphere and 47.8 AE 9.1 ms in the contralateral hemisphere. The latency for the first molar was significantly shorter than that for the canine. The equivalent current dipoles were estimated in the central sulcus and localized anteroinferiorly compared to the locations for the SEFs for the median nerve. No significant differences in three-dimensional coordinates were found between the canine and first molar. These findings demonstrate the precise location of the teeth within the orofacial representation area in the primary somatosensory cortex.

IntroductionBone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) was devised recently as a method of direct maxillary protraction using anchor plates implanted in the maxilla and mandible without involving the teeth. Although several reports have described orthognathic effects of BAMP on patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) with skeletal crossbite, none has described a study of Japanese patients with CLP or of BAMP treatment effects on speech in patients with CLP. This study, by performing BAMP treatment, and by evaluating speech function and skeletal and soft tissues, is intended to clarify BAMP efficacy and safety for patients with unilateral CLP (UCLP) who have skeletal crossbite.Methods and analysisThis single-arm, open-label, non-randomised prospective study examines 20 patients with UCLP with skeletal crossbite (Wits appraisal ≤−5.0 mm). These 10–15 year-old participants had already undergone cheiloplasty, palatoplasty and bone grafting. The anchor plates are implanted in the zygomatic process in the maxilla and in the anterior part of the mandible. Two weeks after anchor plate implantation, maxillary protraction is started using elastics. Protraction is performed at 150 g per side at the start of protraction, 200 g per side from 1 month after the start of protraction and 250 g per side from 3 months after the start of protraction. The treatment period will be approximately 1½ years. Pretreatment and post-treatment, cephalometric analysis, speech evaluation, nasopharyngeal closure function evaluation and facial soft tissue evaluation will be performed to ascertain the effects of BAMP on patients with UCLP.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval for this study has been received from Tohoku Certificated Review Board of Tohoku University, Japan, CRB2200003. The approval number is 2021-34-2. The results of this research shall be presented at domestic and international academic conferences, and be published to peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberjRCTs022210007.

Background Cleft lip is the most common congenital anomaly worldwide. Nevertheless, lip somatosensory characteristics of patients with cleft lip after cheiloplasty have not yet been determined. The present study used magnetoencephalography to objectively evaluate the lip sensation in patients with unilateral cleft lip to establish a new objective evaluation method. Methods Participants were 15 patients with unilateral cleft lip after cheiloplasty (UCL group), and 30 healthy young subjects (control group). Five points of the upper and lower lips were stimulated electrically to measure somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs). The sources of the magnetic fields were modeled as single equivalent current dipoles (ECDs). ECDs located on the central sulcus by superimposition on magnetic resonance images were analyzed. Latency and intensity at 50–75 ms (cP60m) observed in the UCL group were compared with those in the control group. Thresholds of tactile stimuli in both groups were obtained using Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments for subjective sensory evaluation. Results No significant difference was found in the intensity of the cP60m or subjective evaluation between the groups. However, the latency of the cP60m was significantly longer in the upper lip of the UCL group than in the control group. Conclusions SEFs showed a difference in lip sensation between the UCL group and the control group, suggesting that longer latency might be caused by the effects of surgical scarring on the neurotransmission pathway. These results suggest SEFs as useful for the objective evaluation of lip sensations. This study might improve future surgical procedures and lip functions of patients with cleft lip.