The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cutting efficiency of two new reciprocating instruments, Twisted File Adaptive and WaveOne Primary. Material and Methods: 10 new Twisted File Adaptive (TF Adaptive) (SybronEndo, Glendora, CA, USA) and 10 new WaveOne Primary files (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) were activated using a torque-controlled motor, respectively TFA motor (SybronEndo, Glendora, CA, USA) and Silver motor (VDW, Munich, Germany). The device used for the cutting test consisted on a mainframe to which a mobile plastic support for the hand-piece is connected and a stainless-steel block containing a Plexiglas block against which the cutting efficiency of the instruments was tested. The length of the block cut in 1 minute was measured in a computerized program with a precision of 0.1 mm. Mean and standard deviations of each group were calculated and data were statistically analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni t test (P < 0.05). Results: TF Adaptive displayed significantly greater maximum penetration depth than WaveOne Primary (P < 0.05). In fact, TF Adaptive instruments (Group 1) cut the Plexiglas block to a mean depth of 8.7 (SD 0.5) mm, while WaveOne Primary instruments cut the Plexiglas block to a mean depth of 6.4 (SD 0.3) mm. Conclusions: Twisted File Adaptive instruments demonstrated statistically higher cutting efficiency than WaveOne instruments.

BackgroundThe purpose of the present study was to introduce a new device specifically designed to evaluate the cutting efficiency of mechanically driven endodontic instruments.Material/MethodsTwenty new Reciproc R25 (VDW, Munich, Germany) files were used to be investigated in the new device developed to test the cutting ability of endodontic instruments. The device consists of a main frame to which a mobile plastic support for the hand-piece is connected and a stainless-steel block containing a Plexiglas block against which the cutting efficiency of the instruments was tested. The length of the block cut in 1 minute was measured in a computerized program with a precision of 0.1mm. The instruments were activated by using a torque-controlled motor (Silver Reciproc; VDW, Munich, Germany) in a reciprocating movement by the “Reciproc ALL” program (Group 1) and in counter-clockwise rotation at 300 rpm (Group 2). Mean and standard deviations of each group were calculated and data were statistically analyzed with a one-way ANOVA test (P<0.05).ResultsReciproc in reciprocation (Group 1) mean cut in the Plexiglas block was 8.6 mm (SD=0.6 mm), while Reciproc in rotation mean cut was 8.9 mm (SD=0.7 mm). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups investigated (P>0.05).ConclusionsThe cutting testing device evaluated in the present study was reliable and easy to use and may be effectively used to test cutting efficiency of both rotary and reciprocating mechanical endodontic instruments.

Aim: The aim of present study was to compare cyclic fatigue resistance of Twisted files (TF, Sybron Endo, Glendora, CA) instrument used with continuous rotation and the new Motion (TFAdaptive rotating reciprocation), to evaluate if the new reciprocating motion could affect the lifespan of tested instruments. Methodology: 30 new TF instruments were submitted to cyclic fatigue tests. Group 1 instruments were tested using a TFA motion (TFA) while group 2 instruments were used in continuous rotation at 500 rpm (CR). The cyclic fatigue testing device used in the present study has been used for studies on cyclic fatigue resistance previously. The artificial canal was manufactured to provide the instrument with a very challenging trajectory 608 curvature, with a 2 mm radius.All instruments were rotated or reciprocated until fracture occurred. The time to fracture was recorded. All data were subjected to statistical evaluation with analysis of variance test. Results: TFA reciprocating motion showed a significant increase ( p < 0.05) in the time to failure when compared to continuous rotation. Mean time to failure was 131 s (SD AE25.2) for group 1 (TFA), and was 68 s (SD AE14.8) for continuous rotation group (CR).Peer review under responsibility of Società Italiana di Endodonzia.1121-4171/$ -see front matter ß 2014 Società Italiana di Endodonzia. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. http://dx.