Study objective-To demonstrate the efficacy, safety, and appropriate mode of instillation of talc for sclerosis in treatment of malignant pleural effusions (MPEs).Design-A prospective, randomized trial was designed to compare thoracoscopy with talc insufflation (TTI) to thoracostomy and talc slurry (TS) for patients with documented MPE.Measurements-The primary end point was 30-day freedom from radiographic MPE recurrence among surviving patients whose lungs initially re-expanded > 90%. Morbidity, mortality, and quality of life were also assessed.Results-Of 501 patients registered, those eligible were randomized to TTI (n = 242) or TS (n = 240). Patient demographics and primary malignancies were similar between study arms. Overall, there was no difference between study arms in the percentage of patients with successful 30-day outcomes (TTI, 78%; TS, 71%). However, the subgroup of patients with primary lung or breast cancer had higher success with TTI than with TS (82% vs 67%). Common morbidity included fever, dyspnea, and pain. Treatment-related mortality occurred in nine TTI patients and seven TS patients. Respiratory complications were more common following TTI than TS (14% vs 6%).Correspondence to: Carolyn Dresler, MD, MPA, Head, Tobacco Unit, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; Carolyn_dresler@ksg03.harvard.edu. HHS Public Access Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author ManuscriptRespiratory failure was observed in 4% of TS patients and 8% of TTI patients, accounting for five toxic deaths and six toxic deaths, respectively. Quality-of-life measurement demonstrated less fatigue with TTI than TS. Patient ratings of comfort and safety were also higher for TTI, but there were no differences on perceived value or convenience of the procedures. Since that time, a significant number of single institution reports have been published, primarily using thorascopically insufflated talc. However, a growing number of authors have advocated talc slurry via a percutaneously placed chest tube as a simpler and equally effective method for control of MPE with minimal short-term morbidity. However, several reports 10,11 of serious respiratory complications with talc have also been published. Conclusions-BothThe objectives of the current trial Cooperative Groups Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 9334 compare tube thoracostomy with talc slurry (TS) to surgical thoracoscopy with talc insufflation (TTI), and assesses their efficacy at 30 days, in addition to the safety and associated quality of life in a randomized multicenter trial. Portions of this work have been presented in abstract form. 12 Materials and MethodsThis was an intergroup cooperative trial led by the CALGB and monitored semiannually by its Data and Safety Monitoring Board, with participation by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), and the North Central Cooperative Oncology Group, encompassing both private and teaching hospitals. Credentialing of participating surgeon...
With changes in patient weight at abdominal CT, x-ray tube potentials must be varied to maintain a constant detector energy fluence. Increasing the x-ray tube potential generally improves CNR.
The purpose of this study was to investigate how x-ray technique factors and effective doses vary with patient size in chest CT examinations. Technique factors (kVp, mAs, section thickness, and number of sections) were recorded for 44 patients who underwent a routine chest CT examination. Patient weights were recorded together with dimensions and mean Hounsfield unit values obtained from representative axial CT images. The total mass of directly irradiated patient was modeled as a cylinder of water to permit the computation of the mean patient dose and total energy imparted for each chest CT examination. Computed values of energy imparted during the chest CT examination were converted into effective doses taking into account the patient weight. Patient weights ranged from 4.5 to 127 kg, and half the patients in this study were children under 18 years of age. All scans were performed at 120 kVp with a 1 s scan time. The selected tube current showed no correlation with patient weight (r2=0.06), indicating that chest CT examination protocols do not take into account for the size of the patient. Energy imparted increased with increasing patient weight, with values of energy imparted for 10 and 70 kg patients being 85 and 310 mJ, respectively. The effective dose showed an inverse correlation with increasing patient weight, however, with values of effective dose for 10 and 70 kg patients being 9.6 and 5.4 mSv, respectively. Current CT technique factors (kVp/mAs) used to perform chest CT examinations result in relatively high patient doses, which could be reduced by adjusting technique factors based on patient size.
Academic radiology is poised to play an important role in the development and implementation of quantitative imaging (QI) tools. This manuscript, drafted by the Association of University Radiologists (AUR) Radiology Research Alliance (RRA) Quantitative Imaging Task Force, reviews current issues in QI biomarker research. We discuss motivations for advancing QI, define key terms, present a framework for QI biomarker research, and outline challenges in QI biomarker development. We conclude by describing where QI research and development is currently taking place and discussing the paramount role of academic radiology in this rapidly evolving field.
Radiographic techniques for unenhanced chest CT examinations can be reduced from 280 to 120 mAs without compromising image quality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.