To assess the structure and function of the retinal posterior pole in patients with early Parkinson's disease (PD) and to identify possible biomarkers correlated with clinical features. Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional case-control study of 21 patients with PD and 22 age-matched healthy controls (HC) was conducted. All subjects underwent full ophthalmological examinations, fundus perimetry (FP) and spectral domain-OCT (SD-OCT) of the entire retinal posterior pole and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL). Results: We analyzed 41 eyes from 21 patients (14 males and 7 females) with early PD (Hoehn and Yahr scale (H&Y) equal to or less than stage 2) and 41 eyes from 22 HC (12 males and 10 females). We found no significant difference in the pRNFL thickness between patients with PD and HC. The statistical analysis of the SD-OCT posterior pole area, consisting of 64 values for each retinal layer, revealed a decrease in the outer nuclear layer (ONL) thickness in patients with PD (p < 0.0001). On the contrary, a significant increase in the thickness of the outer plexiform layer (OPL) (p < 0.0001) and of the retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) (p= 0.002) compared to healthy controls was detected. Other retinal layers showed no significant statistical differences. The differential light sensitivity (DLS) values measured by FP were significantly lower in patients than the healthy controls (15 [13-16.2] vs 17.95 [16.08-18.96] p<0.0001). Conclusion:Our results showed that DLS and retinal structure differed in the posterior pole between patients with early PD and controls. Thickening of the OPL may represent accumulation of α-synuclein in the OPL of patients with PD.

No abstract

Purpose: To assess the correlation between white‐on‐white standard automated perimetry (SAP), short‐wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP), and spectral‐domain optical coherence tomography (SD‐OCT) parameters of patients with Autosomal Dominant Optic Atrophy (ADOA) genetically confirmed by the presence of the OPA1 gene mutation. Methods: In this observational, cross‐sectional study 25 eyes of 13 patients with a genetic diagnosis of ADOA were included. All participants performed 24‐2C SAP and 24‐2C SWAP in a randomized order. They also underwent a “Posterior Pole” and “peripapillary RNFL (pRNFL)” scanning protocol using SD‐OCT. The thickness of the ETDRS sectors of each retinal layer and pRNFL was obtained and measured. Mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), and fovea sensitivity values were obtained from SAP and SWAP. Correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the association between the mean thickness of each retinal layer and visual field parameters. Results: A moderate correlation was found between SAP MD and RPE thickness on the ETDRS grid. A moderate correlation was found between SWAP MD and whole retina, INL, ORL thicknesses on the ETDRS grid. A strong correlation was found between SWAP PSD and whole retina, GCL, IPL, INL, IRL thicknesses on the ETDRS grid. A strong correlation was also found between SWAP PSD and the temporal sector and PMB values on pRNFL. A strong correlation was found between SAP fovea sensitivity and GCL thickness on the ETDRS grid. A strong correlation was also found between SAP fovea sensitivity and the global pRNFL value. Conclusions: Both SAP and SWAP parameters can provide relevant clinical information on retinal involvement in ADOA patients. The most important function parameters that seem to correlate better with structure involvement were PSD on SWAP and foveal sensitivity on SAP.