Absolute dosimetry with ionization chambers of the narrow photon fields used in stereotactic techniques and IMRT beamlets is constrained by lack of electron equilibrium in the radiation field. It is questionable that stopping-power ratio in dosimetry protocols, obtained for broad photon beams and quasi-electron equilibrium conditions, can be used in the dosimetry of narrow fields while keeping the uncertainty at the same level as for the broad beams used in accelerator calibrations. Monte Carlo simulations have been performed for two 6 MV clinical accelerators (Elekta SL-18 and Siemens Mevatron Primus), equipped with radiosurgery applicators and MLC. Narrow circular and Z-shaped on-axis and off-axis fields, as well as broad IMRT configured beams, have been simulated together with reference 10 x 10 cm2 beams. Phase-space data have been used to generate 3D dose distributions which have been compared satisfactorily with experimental profiles (ion chamber, diodes and film). Photon and electron spectra at various depths in water have been calculated, followed by Spencer-Attix (delta = 10 keV) stopping-power ratio calculations which have been compared to those used in the IAEA TRS-398 code of practice. For water/air and PMMA/air stopping-power ratios, agreements within 0.1% have been obtained for the 10 x 10 cm2 fields. For radiosurgery applicators and narrow MLC beams, the calculated s(w,air) values agree with the reference within +/-0.3%, well within the estimated standard uncertainty of the reference stopping-power ratios (0.5%). Ionization chamber dosimetry of narrow beams at the photon qualities used in this work (6 MV) can therefore be based on stopping-power ratios data in dosimetry protocols. For a modulated 6 MV broad beam used in clinical IMRT, s(w,air) agrees within 0.1% with the value for 10 x 10 cm2, confirming that at low energies IMRT absolute dosimetry can also be based on data for open reference fields. At higher energies (24 MV) the difference in s(w,air) was up to 1.1%, indicating that the use of protocol data for narrow beams in such cases is less accurate than at low energies, and detailed calculations of the dosimetry parameters involved should be performed if similar accuracy to that of 6 MV is sought.
An exhaustive revision of dosimetry data for 192Ir, 125I, 103Pd and 169Yb brachytherapy sources has been performed by means of the EGS4 simulation system. The DLC-136/PHOTX cross section library, water molecular form factors, bound Compton scattering and Doppler broadening of the Compton-scattered photon energy were considered in the calculations. The absorbed dose rate per unit contained activity in a medium at 1 cm in water and air-kerma strength per unit contained activity for each seed model were calculated, allowing the dose rate constant (DRC) A to be estimated. The influence of the calibration procedure on source strength for low-energy brachytherapy seeds is discussed. Conversion factors for 125I and 103Pd seeds to obtain the dose rate in liquid water from the dose rate measured in a solid water phantom with a detector calibrated for dose to water were calculated. A theoretical estimate of the DRC for a 103Pd model 200 seed equal to 0.669 +/- 0.002 cGy h(-1) U(-1) is obtained. Comparison of obtained DRCs with measured and calculated published results shows agreement within 1.5% for 192Ir, 169Yb and 125I sources.
Radial dose functions g(r) in water around 103Pd, 125I, 169Yb and 192Ir brachytherapy sources were estimated by means of the EGS4 simulation system and extensively compared with experimental as well as with theoretical results. The DLC-136/PHOTX cross section library, water molecular form factors, bound Compton scattering and Doppler broadening of the Compton-scattered photon energy were considered in the calculations. Use of the point source approach produces reasonably accurate values of the radial dose function only at distances beyond 0.5 cm for 103Pd sources. It is shown that binding corrections for Compton scattering have a negligible effect on radial dose function for 169Yb and 192Ir seeds and for 103Pd seeds under 5.0 cm from the source centre and for the 125I seed model 6702 under 8.0 cm. Beyond those limits there is an increasing influence of binding corrections on radial dose function for 103Pd and 125I sources. Results in solid water medium underestimate radial dose function for low-energy sources by as much as 6% for 103Pd and 2.5% for 125I already at 2 cm from source centre resulting in a direct underestimation of absolute dose rate values. It was found necessary to consider medium boundaries when comparing results for the radial dose function of 169Yb and 192Ir sources to avoid discrepancies due to the backscattering contribution in the phantom medium. Values of g(r) for all source types studied are presented. Uncertainties lie under 1% within one standard deviation.
Anisotropy functions for low energy interstitial brachytherapy sources are examined. Absolute dose rates around 103Pd seed model 200 and 125I seed models 6702 and 6711 have been estimated by means of the EGS4 Monte Carlo simulation system. The DLC-136/PHOTX cross section library, water molecular form factors, bound Compton scattering and Doppler broadening of the Compton-scattered photon energy were considered in the calculations. Following the formalism developed by the Interstitial Brachytherapy Collaborative Working Group, anisotropy functions, F(r, theta), have been calculated. Our Monte Carlo results were compared against a limited set of measured data selected from the literature and other Monte Carlo results. Binding corrections and phantom material selection have been found to have no influence on the anisotropy function. The accuracy of the geometrical source models used for the Monte Carlo calculations was validated against experimental measurements of in-air relative fluence at 100 cm from the source. More detailed knowledge about the geometrical design of 103Pd seed model 200 is needed in order to improve the agreement with experimentally measured in-air fluence. Values for in-air fluence of 125I model 6702 are sensitive to source position within the inner seed cylinder. Excellent agreement between calculated and measured in-air fluence is found for 125I model 6711. It was observed that using in-air relative fluence at 100 cm from the source to calculate the anisotropy function yields a less anisotropic dose distribution at distances close to the source than full Monte Carlo simulation, in contradiction with experimental data. Our results have estimated statistical uncertainties of 1%-3% at the 1sigma level within clinically relevant regions, but contain systematic uncertainties related to the assumed geometrical details.
The experimental bandhead excitation energies of two-quasineutron rotational bands in 100 Zr and 102 Zr nuclei have been used in the frame of the quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) pairing model to determine the strength G of the neutron pairing interaction. Using this strength, the bandhead excitation energies of two-quasineutron rotational bands in 98 Sr and 100 Sr have been predicted. Effects of the particle number fluctuation, introduced by the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer approximation, and absent in the QMC approach, are discussed. Shapes and ground-state properties of neutron-rich zirconium and strontium isotopes are calculated using the macroscopic-microscopic method with the universal Woods-Saxon average potential and a monopole pairing residual interaction to obtain single-particle schemes relevant for pairing calculations. Our calculations are in good agreement with the experimental groundstate deformation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.