IntroductIon Common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus, Montagu, 1821) are globally distributed between the 60 th parallels in temperate to tropical oceanic and coastal waters, and estuarine populations have been documented throughout their range (Jefferson et al. 2008, Wells and Scott 2018). In the Gulf of Mexico (GOM), common bottlenose dolphins (hereafter referred to as "bottlenose dolphins") are widely distributed in bays, sounds, estuaries, and coastal waters, including the waters of Texas (

No abstract

Few accounts describe predator-prey interactions between common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus Montagu 1821) and marine catfish (Ariopsis felis Linnaeus 1766, Bagre marinus Mitchill 1815). Over the course of 50,167 sightings of bottlenose dolphin groups in Mississippi Sound and along the Florida coast of the Gulf of Mexico, severed catfish heads were found floating and exhibiting movements at the surface in close proximity to 13 dolphin groups that demonstrated feeding behavior. These observations prompted a multi-disciplinary approach to study the predator-prey relationship between bottlenose dolphins and marine catfish. A review was conducted of bottlenose dolphin visual survey data and dorsal fin photographs from sightings where severed catfish heads were observed. Recovered severed catfish heads were preserved and studied, whole marine catfish were collected and examined, and stranding network pathology reports were reviewed for references to injuries related to fish spines. Photographic identification analysis confirms eight dolphins associated with severed catfish heads were present in three such sightings across an approximately 350 km expanse of coast between the Mississippi Sound and Saint Joseph Bay, FL. An examination of the severed catfish heads indicated interaction with dolphins, and fresh-caught whole hardhead catfish (A. felis) were examined to estimate the presumed total length of the catfish before decapitation. Thirty-eight instances of significant trauma or death in dolphins attributed to ingesting whole marine catfish were documented in stranding records collected from the southeastern United States of America. Bottlenose dolphins typically adhere to a ram-feeding strategy for prey capture followed by whole prey ingestion; however, marine catfish skull morphology may pose a consumption hazard due to rigid spines that can puncture and migrate through soft tissue, prompting a prey handling technique for certain dolphins, facilitating consumption of the posterior portion of the fish without the head.

West Bay is located along the south‐west portion of Galveston Bay, Texas, and has been delimited as a bay, sound, and estuary (BSE) common bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) stock area under the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972. The most recent abundance estimate available for the West Bay BSE stock is from 2001 and is considered outdated for management purposes. This study provides an updated abundance estimate using photo‐identification capture‐mark‐recapture (CMR) data collected from West Bay during the winter of 2014 and summer of 2015. The CMR data were analysed using both Pollock's robust design models and Poisson‐log normal mark‐resight models. Differences between the model types are discussed, and the abundance estimates derived from the mark‐resight models are recommended for management use (50.63 [unconditional SE 2.23] in the winter and 44.36 [unconditional SE 1.18] in the summer). Whereas the updated abundance estimates are higher than the previously reported estimates, which varied between 28 and 38, they still indicate that West Bay supports a small population of bottlenose dolphins. As a result, the West Bay BSE stock should be closely monitored for impacts, particularly those related to human caused stressors.