No abstract

No abstract

These evidence-based guidelines have been produced after a systematic literature review of a range of issues involving prevention, diagnosis and treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). Prevention is structured into sections addressing general issues, equipment, patient procedures and the environment, whereas in treatment, the structure addresses the use of antimicrobials in prevention and treatment, adjunctive therapies and the application of clinical protocols. The sections dealing with diagnosis are presented against the clinical, radiological and microbiological diagnosis of HAP. Recommendations are also made upon the role of invasive sampling and quantitative microbiology of respiratory secretions in directing antibiotic therapy in HAP/ventilator-associated pneumonia.

The quality of research in hospital epidemiology (infection control) must be improved to be robust enough to influence policy and practice. In order to raise the standards of research and publication, a CONSORT equivalent for these largely quasi-experimental studies has been prepared by the authors of two relevant systematic reviews, following consultation with learned societies, editors of journals and researchers. It consists of a 22 item checklist, and a summary table. The emphasis is on transparency to improve the quality of reporting and on the use of appropriate statistical techniques. The statement has been endorsed by a number of professional special interest groups and societies. Like CONSORT, ORION should be considered a 'work in progress', which requires ongoing dialogue for successful promotion and dissemination. The statement is therefore offered for further public discussion. Journals and research councils are strongly recommended to incorporate it into their submission and reviewing processes. Feedback to the authors is encouraged and the statement will be revised in 2 years.

Of the interventions designed to reduce antibiotic resistance rates in hospitals, one that is currently attracting considerable interest, particularly in the intensive care unit setting, is antibiotic cycling or rotation. Cycling is the scheduled rotation of one class of antibiotics with one or more different classes exhibiting comparable spectra of activity; in order to fulfil the definition, the cycle must be repeated. Following a search of the literature we identified 11 articles in which the authors claimed to have evaluated the efficacy of this intervention. Only four were suitable for review, but, owing to multiple methodological flaws and a lack of standardization, the results of these studies do not permit reliable conclusions regarding the efficacy of cycling. Further studies are therefore required in order to resolve this question. However, before such studies can be undertaken, there are a great many issues relating to cycling which must be addressed. For the time being, we advise against the routine implementation of this measure as a means of reducing antibiotic resistance rates.