Objectives: To systematically assess the efficacy and safety of IL-17 inhibitors in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning IL-17 inhibitors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Meta-analyses were used to determine the efficacy and safety of the IL-17 inhibitors in the treatment of these patients. The primary endpoint was predefined as the proportion of patients with at least 20% improvement in the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS20) response criteria at week 16, and the secondary endpoint was defined as ASAS40 at week 16. Results: Six phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials including 1733 patients (1153 patients received IL-17 inhibitors, including secukinumab or ixekizumab, whereas 580 patients received a placebo as comparators) were included. At week 16, the IL-17 inhibitor regimen produced a significant increase in the ASAS20 response rate (RR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.45 to 1.84, p = 0.00) and the secondary endpoint ASAS40 response rate (RR = 2.12, 95% CI 1.75 to 2.56, p = 0.00) versus those for the placebo. With respect to the safety profile, more treatmentemergent adverse events (RR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.22, p = 0.03) and non-severe infections (RR = 1.82, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.37, p < 0.001) were described after treatment with IL-17 inhibitors than after treatment with placebo, while no increased risk of other adverse events was indicated after IL-17 inhibitor therapy, including death, discontinuation due to adverse events, or serious adverse events. Conclusions: IL-17 inhibitors produced favorable response rates but an increased risk of non-severe infections in the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis.
Fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS), synovial tissue-specific cells, are key effector cells during the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our previous study has shown that tripartite motif-containing protein 3 (TRIM3) overexpression inhibits the proliferation and cytokine secretion of RA FLS. Experiments with gene knockout mice have suggested the important roles of forkhead box o3a (Foxo3a) in RA pathogenesis. The present study aimed to investigate the correlation between Foxo3a and TRIM3 during RA pathogenesis. The expression of Foxo3a and TRIM3 was reduced in RA synovial tissues in comparison to healthy controls, and Foxo3a messenger RNA (mRNA) expression in RA synovial tissues correlated positively with TRIM3 mRNA expression. We found that stimulation with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) caused the downregulation of Foxo3a and TRIM3 in FLS. Foxo3a or TRIM3 overexpression significantly attenuated the promoting effects of LPS on cell proliferation and the release of tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and IL-1β. In addition, Foxo3a suppressed the inhibitory effects of LPS on the mRNA and protein levels of TRIM3, as well as the activity of TRIM3 promoter. Foxo3a or TRIM3 overexpression attenuated collagen-induced arthritis in rats. Furthermore, knockdown of TRIM3 significantly suppressed the effects of Foxo3a overexpression on LPS-activated FLS. In summary, our findings suggested that Foxo3a exerted inhibitory effects on LPS-induced proliferation and inflammation through increasing TRIM3 transcription. The decreased expression of Foxo3a may contribute to the RA pathogenesis. K E Y W O R D S cytokines, FLS, Foxo3a, proliferation, TRIM3
Objectives: To systematically assess the efficacy and safety of IL-17 inhibitors in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning IL-17 inhibitors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Meta-analyses were used to determine the efficacy and safety of the IL-17 inhibitors in the treatment of these patients. The primary end point was predefined as the proportion of patients with at least 20% improvement in the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS20) response criteria at week 16, and the secondary end point was defined as ASAS40 at week 16. Results: Six phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials including 1733 patients (1153 patients received IL-17 inhibitors, including secukinumab or ixekizumab, whereas 580 patients received a placebo as comparators) were included. At week 16, the IL-17 inhibitor regimen produced a significant increase in the ASAS20 response rate (RR=1.63, 95% CI 1.45 to 1.84, p=0.00) and the secondary endpoint ASAS40 response rate (RR=2.12, 95% CI 1.75 to 2.56, p=0.00) versus those for the placebo. With respect to the safety profile, more treatment-emergent adverse events (RR=1.11, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.22, p=0.03) and non-severe infections (RR=1.82, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.37, p<0.001) were described after treatment with IL-17 inhibitors than after treatment with placebo, while no increased risk of other adverse events was indicated after IL-17 inhibitor therapy, including death, discontinuation due to adverse events, or serious adverse events. Conclusions: IL-17 inhibitors produced favourable response rates but an increased risk of non-severe infections in the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis.
Objectives To assess the e cacy and safety of jakinibs for the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients with an inadequate response or intolerance to conventional synthetic or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Methods A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of jakinibs in RA patients were eligible. The effective outcome was RA improvement to reach an American College of Rheumatology 20%/50%/70% (ACR20/50/70) response rate at week 12 and 24 after treatment. The safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), discontinuations due to adverse events, infections and serious infections. Results Twenty-eight randomized, double-blind, controlled trials including 14500 patients were included. Both at week 12 and 24, the pooled analysis was suggestive of an effective treatment with jakinibs, represented as the increased clinical response of ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70. The subgroup analysis based on different types of jakinibs demonstrated that only pe citinib treatment had no impact on the clinical response of ACR50 or ACR70 at week 12. Jakinibs were associated with an increased incidence of infections at week 12 and TEAEs and infections at week 24. No increase in the risk of SAEs, discontinuations due to adverse events, or serious infections was observed in comparisons between treatment with jakinibs and treatment with placebo in these patients. Conclusions Jakinibs are e cacious and well tolerated in RA patients up to a period of 24 weeks, although they are associated with an increased risk of infectious complications. MethodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for the meta-analysis of interventional studies [17]. The authors declare that all supporting data are available within the article and/or supplementary materials. This study did not require ethical approval or informed consent since all analyses were based on previously published data. Data sources and search strategyWe performed an exhaustive search for studies that evaluated the e cacy and safety of jakinibs in patients with active RA in bibliographic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library, from their inceptions to February 1, 2020. The papers were not restricted concerning publication status or language. A combination of the following keywords was used: "rheumatoid arthritis", "ra", and "protein kinases inhibitor" "janus kinase inhibitor", "jak inhibitor", and "jakinib". The search was independently performed by two investigators (YY and ML), and discrepancies in the study selection were resolved by consensus. The search strategy is listed in online supplementary table S1. The references in the enrolled trials or metaanalyses were also screened manually to nd relevant original studies. Study selectionThe relevant data from the RCTs comparing the...
Objectives: To systematically assess the efficacy and safety of IL-17 inhibitors in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis.Methods: Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning IL-17 inhibitors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. The efficacy and safety of the IL-17 inhibitors in the treatment of these patients were compared to those of a placebo. The primary end point was predefined as the proportion of patients with at least 20% improvement in the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS20) response criteria at week 16, and the secondary end point was defined as ASAS40 at week 16.Results: Six phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials including 1733 patients (1153 patients received IL-17 inhibitors, including secukinumab or ixekizumab, whereas 580 patients received a placebo as comparators) were included. At week 16, the IL-17 inhibitor regimen produced a significant increase in the ASAS20 response rate (RR=1.63, 95% CI 1.45 to 1.84, p=0.00) and the secondary endpoint ASAS40 response rate (RR=2.12, 95% CI 1.75 to 2.56, p=0.00) versus those for the placebo. With respect to the safety profile, more infectious diseases were described after treatment with IL-17 inhibitors than after treatment with placebo (RR=1.82, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.37, p<0.001), while no increased risk of other adverse events was indicated after IL-17 inhibitor therapy, including treatment-emergent adverse events, death, discontinuation due to adverse event, serious adverse events, or total adverse events.Conclusions: IL-17 inhibitors produced favourable response rates but an increased risk of infectious diseases in the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.