Aluminium phosphide (AlP) is a toxic agent associated with a high mortality rate following acute exposure from various routes. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical and laboratory findings useful for predicting the medical outcome of AlP-poisoned patients using established scoring systems. This is a prospective study of AlP-poisoned patients from 2010 to 2015 in Ardabil, Iran. All patients that presented with a confirmed diagnosis of acute AlP poisoning in the study interval were included in the study. Clinical and laboratory data, using Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) scoring systems, were compared for their predictive value in determining differences between survived and non-survived patients. Univariate analysis (Mann-Whitney or t-test), multiple logistic regression analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the Pearson correlation test were performed using STATA/SE 13.0 and the Nomolog Software. A total of 68 AlP-poisoned patients with confirmed acute AlP poisoning were included for evaluation. Of these, 36 were non-survived. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed using parameters and values derived from patient clinical and laboratory data, and revealed that four factors were significant for predicting mortality: Glasgow coma score (GCS); systolic blood pressure (SBP); urinary output (UOP); and serum HCO . A four-variable, risk-prediction nomogram was developed for identifying high-risk patients and predicting the risk of mortality. Study results showed that SBP of <92.5 mmHg (p = 0.006); HCO < 12.9 mEq/L (p = 0.01), UOP < 1725 mL/day (p = 0.04); and GCS < 14.5 (p = 0.003) were significant predictors of AlP mortality. Scoring systems analysis showed SAPS II score >24.5, APACHE II score >8.5 and SOFA score >7.5 were predictive of non-survival patients. The results of our study showed that SBP, GCS, UOP and serum HCO levels are the best prognostic factors for predicting mortality in AlP-poisoned patients. According to the area under the ROC curve of the APACHE II score, when compared with SOFA and SAPS II scores, the APACHE II score can more effectively discriminate between non-survivors and survived patients.
PurposeBreast and cervical cancers are the most commonly diagnosed type of cancer and cause of cancer-related deaths in Iranian females. In contrast to previous studies, this study was carried out with a large sample size for assessment of breast self-examination (BSE)-, clinical breast examination (CBE)-, mammography-, and Pap smear-uptake rates and determination of associations among these screening behaviors with sociodemographic and cognitive variables in Azeri females.Materials and methodsThis was a cross-sectional, community-based study that was carried out among 1,134 females 20–60 years old during March–June 2016. Data-collection variables included sociodemographic questions, screening behaviors for breast and cervical cancer, self-efficacy, beliefs, and barriers to breast and cervical cancer screening. Collected data were analyzed by SPSS version 13 using χ2, Mann–Whitney U, and logistic regression tests.ResultsAmong the 1,134 participants, 53.9%, 9.8%, and 28.1% had done BSE, CBE, and Pap smear tests, respectively, and among the 625 females aged >40 years, 187 (29.9%) had done the mammography test. Moreover, 416 (36.7%), 103 (16.5%), and 64 (5.6%) females had done BSE, mammography, and CBE regularly, respectively. Beliefs, barriers, income, health insurance, number of children, and age were all important factors for BSE and regular BSE and mammography. Females who had high belief scores were more likely to undertake mammography (odds ratio [OR]: 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03–1.5), regular mammography (OR: 4.2, 95% CI: 1.9–9.3), regular CBE (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.2–1.3), and Pap smears (OR: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1–1.4). Also, females who had high self-efficacy scores were more likely to perform regular BSE (OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.4–2.5) and mammography (OR: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.4–4.6) than females with lower self-efficacy scores.ConclusionThe frequency of breast and cervical cancer screening was low in our study. The findings of this study indicated that beliefs, self-efficacy, and barriers were important predictive factors of cancer-screening behavior among the females studied.
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the levels of serum pro-brain natriuretic peptide (pro-BNP) and interleukin (IL)-6 in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to correlate these markers with health-related quality of life using the COPD assessment test (CAT). Materials and Methods: Serum pro-BNP and IL-6 levels were measured in 82 patients with stable COPD. Serum pro-BNP and serum IL-6 levels, pulmonary function, and oxygen saturation (SpO2) were measured according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage and CAT score. Also, the associations of both pro-BNP and IL-6 with the clinical parameters of patients were tested. Results: The serum levels of IL-6 (7.57 [5-11.16] pg/mL) and pro-BNP (120.55 [92.89-144.20] pg/mL) were higher with enhancing disease severity based on the GOLD classification (p = 0.034 and 0.068, respectively). Also, serum levels of pro-BNP (120.55 [89.50-147.90] pg/mL) and IL-6 (6.68 [4.40-11.97] pg/mL) were increased in patients with high CAT scores (p = 0.004 and 0.017, respectively). There was a significant positive correlation between plasma pro-BNP and IL-6 levels (r = 0.332, p = 0.002). Conclusion: The results demonstrated that with increased severity of obstruction based on the GOLD criteria both IL-6 and pro-BNP were elevated. This increase in inflammatory markers was associated with a reduced quality of life and the severity of hypoxia. These findings indicated that lowering IL-6 and pro-BNP could be useful in the management of COPD patients.
Although methemoglobinemia following aluminum phosphide (AlP) intoxication has been reported, probable effect of blood level of methemoglobin (Met-Hb)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.