PurposeGrouping COPD subjects into clinical phenotypes might be useful for the management of the disease, but the clinical implications of such classification are still not totally clear, especially regarding prognosis. The primary objective of this study was to assess whether the mortality rates were different between four predefined clinical phenotypes.Patients and methodsThis is a retrospective, observational study carried out at the COPD clinic of a University Hospital. A total of 891 COPD patients were classified, according to the Spanish COPD guidelines, into the following four phenotypes: asthma–COPD overlap (ACO; 75 subjects), nonexacerbator (NONEX; 531 subjects), exacerbator with chronic bronchitis (EXCB; 194 subjects), and exacerbator with emphysema (EXEMPH; 91 subjects). We compared the mortality outcomes between the phenotypes.ResultsAfter a follow-up of 48.4±25.2 months, there were 194 deaths (21.8%). There were significant differences in all-cause mortality between phenotypes. The ACO phenotype had the best long-term prognosis, whereas EXEMPH had the highest risk of death. NONEX and EXCB mortality figures were in between the other two groups. We also found some differences in the causes of death, and patients with EXEMPH were at a higher risk of dying because of COPD itself. The differences in mortality did not seem related to the classification into phenotypes in itself but to disparities in COPD severity and comorbidity load between groups.ConclusionClassifying COPD patients according to several predefined clinical phenotypes can identify clusters of subjects with different mortality outcomes. Some phenotypes are associated with a specific cause of death. The mechanisms that underlie these differences seem to be related to COPD severity and comorbidities.

Background: Comorbidities are very common in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), contributing to the overall severity of the disease. The relative prevalence of comorbidities in COPD caused by biomass smoke (B-COPD), compared with COPD related to tobacco (T-COPD), is not well known. Objectives: To establish if both types of COPD are associated with a different risk for several major comorbidities. Method: The prevalence of comorbidities was compared in 863 subjects with B-COPD (n = 179, 20.7%) or T-COPD (n = 684, 79.2%). Multivariate analysis was carried out to explore the independent relationship between comorbidities and type of exposure. Results: Three comorbidities were more frequent in T-COPD than in B-COPD: ischemic heart disease (11.5 vs. 5.0%, respectively, p = 0.01), peripheral vascular disease (9.2 vs. 2.7%, p = 0.006), and peptic ulcer disease (4.8% vs. 0, p = 0.005). After correcting for potential confounding variables, the risk of ischemic heart disease was lower in B-COPD than in T-COPD (OR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.16-0.69, p = 0.003). Conclusions: The prevalence of ischemic heart disease is significantly lower in B-COPD than in T-COPD, suggesting a different systemic effect of both types of smoke in COPD patients.

Though idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is characterized by single-organ involvement, many comorbid conditions occur within other organ systems. Patients with IPF may present during evolution different complications and comorbidities that influence the prognosis and modify the natural course of their disease. In this chapter, we highlight common comorbid conditions encountered in IPF, discuss disease-specific diagnostic modalities, and review the current treatment data for several key comorbidities. The diagnosis and treatment of these comorbidities is a challenge for the pulmonologist specialized in interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). We will focus on pulmonary emphysema, lung cancer, gastroesophageal reflux, pulmonary hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea (sleep disorders), and acute exacerbation of IPF.

No abstract

No abstract