No abstract

Background and Aims Clinical trials and real-life studies with ustekinumab in Crohn's disease (CD) have shown a good efficacy and safety profile. However, these data are scarcely available in elderly patients. Therefore, we aim to assess the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in elderly patients with CD. Methods Elderly patients (>60 years old) from the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry treated with ustekinumab due to CD were included. Every patient was matched with two controls under 60 years of age, according to anti-TNF use and smoking habit. Values for the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI), endoscopic activity, C-reactive protein (CRP), and faecal calprotectin (FC) were recorded at baseline and at weeks 16, 32 and 54. Results 648 patients were included, 212 elderlies. Effectiveness was similar between young and elderly patients during the follow-up. Steroid-free remision was similar at week 16 (54.6 vs 51.4%, p=0.20), 32 (53.0% vs 54.5%, p=0.26) and 54 (57.8% vs 51.1%, p=0.21). Persistence of ustekinumab as maintenance therapy was similar in both age groups (log-rank test; p=0.91). There was no difference in the rate of adverse effects (14.2% vs 11.2%, p=0.350), including severe infections (7.1% vs 7.3%, p=1.00), except for the occurrence of de novo neoplasms, which was higher in older patients (0.7% vs 4.3%, p= 0.003). Conclusions Ustekinumab is as effective in elderly patients with CD, as it is in non-elderly. Safety profile seems to be also similar but for a higher rate of de novo neoplasms, probably related to the age of the elderly patients.

Summary Background and Aims Patients with colonic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have a high risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Current guidelines recommend endoscopic surveillance, yet epidemiological studies show poor compliance. The aims of our study were to analyse adherence to endoscopic surveillance, its impact on advanced colorectal lesions, and risk factors of non‐adherence. Methods A retrospective multicentre study of IBD patients with criteria for CRC surveillance, diagnosed between 2005 and 2008 and followed up to 2020, was performed. Following European guidelines, patients were stratified into risk groups and adherence was considered when surveillance was performed according to the recommendations (±1 year). Cox‐proportional regression analyses were used to compare the risk of lesions. p‐values below 0.05 were considered significant. Results A total of 1031 patients (732 ulcerative colitis, 259 Crohn’s disease and 40 indeterminate colitis; mean age of 36 ± 15 years) were recruited from 25 Spanish centres. Endoscopic screening was performed in 86% of cases. Adherence to guidelines was 27% (95% confidence interval, CI = 24–29). Advanced lesions and CRC were detected in 38 (4%) and 7 (0.7%) patients respectively. Adherence was associated with increased detection of advanced lesions (HR = 3.59; 95% CI = 1.3–10.1; p = 0.016). Risk of delay or non‐performance of endoscopic follow‐up was higher as risk groups increased (OR = 3.524; 95% CI = 2.462–5.044; p < 0.001 and OR = 4.291; 95%CI = 2.409–7.644; p < 0.001 for intermediate‐ and high‐ vs low‐risk groups). Conclusions Adherence to endoscopic surveillance allows earlier detection of advanced lesions but is low. Groups at higher risk of CRC are associated with lower adherence.

No abstract

Background: The impact of biologics on the risk of postoperative complications (PC) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is still an ongoing debate. This lack of evidence is more relevant for ustekinumab and vedolizumab. Aims: To evaluate the impact of biologics on the risk of PC. Methods: A retrospective study was performed in 37 centres. Patients treated with biologics within 12 weeks before surgery were considered “exposed”. The impact of the exposure on the risk of 30-day PC and the risk of infections was assessed by logistic regression and propensity score-matched analysis. Results: A total of 1535 surgeries were performed on 1370 patients. Of them, 711 surgeries were conducted in the exposed cohort (584 anti-TNF, 58 vedolizumab and 69 ustekinumab). In the multivariate analysis, male gender (OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.2–2.0), urgent surgery (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.2–2.2), laparotomy approach (OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.1–1.9) and severe anaemia (OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.3–2.6) had higher risk of PC, while academic hospitals had significantly lower risk. Exposure to biologics (either anti-TNF, vedolizumab or ustekinumab) did not increase the risk of PC (OR: 1.2; 95% CI: 0.97–1.58), although it could be a risk factor for postoperative infections (OR 1.5; 95% CI: 1.03–2.27). Conclusion: Preoperative administration of biologics does not seem to be a risk factor for overall PC, although it may be so for postoperative infections.