No abstract

Background: Antifungal prophylaxis is recommended for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) to decrease the incidence of invasive fungal infections (IFI). This study aimed to compare the two groups of antifungal prophylaxis in pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT.Methods: This observational, analytic, retrospective cohort study compared the incidence of IFI with antifungal prophylaxis with voriconazole vs. other antifungals in the first 100 days after allogeneic HSCT in patients aged <18 years between 2012 and 2018. The statistical analysis included univariate and multivariate analyses and determination of the cumulative incidence of invasive fungal infection by the Kaplan-Meier method using STATA 14 statistical software.Results: A total of 139 allogeneic HSCT were performed. The principal diagnosis was acute leukemia (63%). The 75% had haploidentical donors, and 50% used an antifungal in the month before transplantation. Voriconazole (69%) was the most frequently administered antifungal prophylaxis. The cumulative incidence of IFI was 5% (7 cases). Of the patients with IFIs, four began prophylaxis with voriconazole, one with caspofungin, and one with fluconazole. Additionally, six were possible cases, one was proven (Candida parapsilosis), and 1/7 died. Conclusion:There were no differences in the incidence of IFI between patients who received prophylaxis with voriconazole and other antifungal agents.

Background: Cytomegalovirus infection represents a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of viremia and disease due to cytomegalovirus and the risk factors in pediatric patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in our institution. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort of patients under 19 years of age who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation due to any indication between 2012 and 2019. The analysis included the diagnosis of cytomegalovirus viremia or disease during post-transplant follow-up, evaluation of risk factors, and outcomes.The statistical analysis included univariate and multivariate analyses, and the cumulative incidence of cytomegalovirus viremia was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method using STATA 14 statistical software.Results: A total of 182 transplants were included. At 100 days, the cumulative incidence of cytomegalovirus viremia was 70.5%, and that of cytomegalovirus disease was 4.7%. Overall survival at 2 years was 74%, and event-free survival was 64%. The remaining demographic characteristics were not predictors of infection. There was no association between viremia and relapse or survival of the patients. Higher mortality was noted in cytomegalovirus disease.Conclusions: During the study period, the incidence of cytomegalovirus disease was similar to that of other pediatric reports, but the incidence of viremia was higher. Preemptive therapy has diminished disease rates and death due to infection. Viral load cutoff points should be standardized to guide treatment and avoid myelotoxicity.

Background: Multiple primary malignant neoplasms are not frequent but are increasing in incidence. Some of them are associated with genetic syndromes such as von Hippel-Lindau syndrome and Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Dedifferentiated liposarcoma is one of the rarest soft tissue tumors, and clear cell renal carcinoma is the most frequent kidney cancer. The concomitant presence of these tumors is extremely rare; however, some cases have been reported, none of them presenting with liposarcoma of the limbs. We report an interesting case of a patient with synchronous multiple primary tumors presenting with a very rare liposarcoma associated with renal cell carcinoma (a very rare association). A review of the literature and a collection of similar cases published previously are also provided. Case presentation: We report a case of a 62-year-old Hispanic man who presented to our institution with a left thigh mass compatible with dedifferentiated liposarcoma synchronous with metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma. Multiple treatment lines were provided with no response, with a further metastatic transformation. Genetic analysis by liquid biopsy showed some mutations that were not susceptible to targeted therapy. At the time of this report, the patient is undergoing palliative care because his nonresponsive metastatic disease persists. Conclusions: We present the first reported case of clear cell renal carcinoma synchronous with dedifferentiated liposarcoma of a limb. The association between renal cell carcinoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma is unusual, and there are few reports of this presentation in the literature. More research about these tumors along with genetic tests needs to be performed to seek a better understanding of the fundamental basis of this rare association.

No abstract