Competition for mate acquisition is the hallmark of any sexual organism. In insect-pollinated plants, competition to attract pollinators is expected to result in pollinator-mediated selection on attractive floral traits. This could overlap with sexual selection if the number of mating partners increases with pollinator attraction, resulting in an improved reproductive success. In this study, we measured a set of floral traits and estimated individual fitness in male and female Silene dioica in an experimental population. Results align with the predictions of Bateman’s principles, in the absence of pollen limitation. In females, natural selection acted on traits that are typically linked with fertility (number of flowers and number of gametes), and selection strength was similar in open- and hand-pollinated females, suggesting a limited role of pollinator-mediated selection. In males, flowering duration and corolla width were positively associated with both reproductive success and number of mates, suggesting that sexual selection has played a role in the evolution of these traits. The use of Bateman’s metrics further confirmed stronger sexual selection in males than in females. Taken together, our results shed light on the occurrence of sex-specific patterns of selection in an insect-pollinated plant population.

In animal-pollinated angiosperms, the ‘male-function’ hypothesis claims that male reproductive success (RS) should benefit from large floral displays, through pollinator attraction, while female RS is expected to be mainly limited by resource availability. As appealing as this theory might be, studies comparing selection strength on flower number in both sexes rarely document the expected asymmetry. This discrepancy could arise because flower number impacts both pollinator attraction and overall gamete number. In this study, we artificially manipulate floral displays to disentangle the fertility versus pollinator attraction components of selection, both in terms of mating and RS. In females, flower number was under strong fertility selection, as predicted in the absence of pollen limitation. By contrast, in males, flower number was mainly under sexual selection, which in turn increased male RS. However, these selection patterns were not different in males with artificially increased floral displays. This suggests that sexual selection acting on flower number in males does not occur because flower number increases pollinator attraction, but rather because more pollen is available to disperse on more mates. Our study illustrates the power of disentangling various components of selection with potentially sex-specific effects for understanding the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

No abstract