Diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) contain 2 major molecular subtypes; namely, the germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) and the activated B-cell-like (ABC) DLBCLs. It is well documented that ABC-DLBCL cases have a significantly poorer survival response than GCB-DLBCLs in both the CHOP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and prednisone) and the rituximab (R)-CHOP eras. However, the underlying cause of this subtype disparity is poorly understood. Nevertheless, these clinical observations raise the possibility for an ABC-DLBCL-specific resistance mechanism that is directed toward 1 of the CHOP components and is inadequately addressed by rituximab. Here, we report that the main cytotoxic ingredient in CHOP, doxorubicin (Dox), has subtype-specific mechanisms of cytotoxicity in DLBCLs resulting from differences in the subcellular distribution pattern. Specifically, in cell line models of ABC-DLBCL, Dox is often enriched in the cytoplasm away from the nuclear DNA. As a result, Dox-induced cytotoxicity in ABC-DLBCLs is often dependent on oxidative stress, rather than DNA damage response. These findings are corroborated by gene signature analysis, which demonstrates that basal oxidative stress status predicts treatment outcome among patients with ABC-DLBCL, but not patients with GCB-DLBCL. In terms of redox-related resistance mechanism, our results suggest that STAT3 confers Dox resistance in ABC-DLBCLs by reinforcing an antioxidant program featuring upregulation of the SOD2 gene. Furthermore, a small-molecule STAT3 inhibitor synergizes with CHOP to trigger oxidative stress and kill ABC-DLBCL cells in preclinical models. These results provide a mechanistic basis for development of novel therapies that target either STAT3 or redox homeostasis to improve treatment outcomes for ABC-DLBCLs.

The advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has introduced an exciting new era in biomedical research. NGS forms the foundation of current genetic testing approaches, including targeted gene panel testing, as well as more comprehensive whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing. Together, these approaches promise to provide critical insights into the understanding of health and disease. However, with NGS testing come many ethical questions and concerns, particularly when testing involves children. These concerns are especially relevant for children with cancer, where the testing of tumor and germline tissues is increasingly being incorporated into clinical care. Areas covered: In this manuscript, we explore the key ethical considerations related to conducting germline NGS testing in pediatric oncology, focusing on the four main principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy and justice. Expert commentary: The ethical issues surrounding germline NGS testing are complex and result in part from our limited understanding of the medical relevance of many of the results obtained and poor knowledge of the impacts of testing, both beneficial and detrimental, on patients and their families. In this article we discuss the risks and benefits of germline NGS testing and the arguments for and against such testing in children with cancer.

No abstract

e18666 Background: Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia/ Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (ALL/LLy) is the most common pediatric cancer. Invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) is prevalent in this population and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends pneumococcal vaccination to decrease morbidity and mortality. Despite these recommendations, vaccination rates remain low and the incidence of IPD among children with hematologic malignancy is significantly higher compared to the average pediatric population. An interventional study was designed to improve the vaccination rate and reduce the incidence of IPD in our institution. Methods: A plan-do-study-act (PDSA) model of quality improvement (QI) was used. Chart review at our institute was done for the 6-month period of January 2020 - June 2020 and baseline rates for pneumococcal polysaccharide (PPSV23) vaccination were calculated. Patients were included if they were ≥ 2 years old, diagnosed with ALL/LLy, and undergoing maintenance. A multidisciplinary team performed the root cause analysis. Immunization records were obtained and reviewed and targeted interventions were implemented. The interventions used are outlined in Table. The percentage of pediatric ALL/LLy patients per month in maintenance who received age-appropriate pneumococcal vaccinations was monitored before and after the interventions. Results: Analysis of the 6-month retrospective cohort (n=36) showed a baseline vaccination rate of 5.5%. During the subsequent 6-month phase with interventions, 40 patients were prospectively enrolled. Demographics showed a mean age of 10.2 years (range, 2-21) and a predominantly male (66.7%) cohort. B-cell ALL/LLy comprised the majority (78.9%); the rest included T-cell ALL/LLy and mixed phenotype acute leukemia. As seen in Table, the percentage receiving at least 1 pneumococcal vaccine increased from 5.5% to 84.8% over the first 3 months, this plateaued around 81%. Completion of the series mirrored this and increased to 74.2%. Pre-visit planning and cues proved to be the most helpful interventions. Conclusions: Use of a PDSA model successfully improved pneumococcal vaccination rates in the pediatric ALL/LLy population. We suggest these results can be achieved with planning and implementation of the outlined interventions. [Table: see text]

In this case, a primary care physician is presented with direct-toconsumer genetic test results and asked to provide counseling and order follow-up diagnostics. In order to deal effectively with this situation, we suggest physicians need look no further than the practice principles that guide more routine clinical encounters. We examine the rationale behind 2 major clinical ethical considerations: (1) physicians have obligations to help their patients achieve reasonable health goals but are not obligated to perform procedures that are not medically indicated; and (2) primary care physicians do not need to know everything; they just need to know how to get their patients appropriate care. CaseA 34-year-old woman, Sarah, schedules a routine visit with her family physician, Dr S, to discuss results of a direct-to-consumer genetic test she ordered from an online vendor. After sending a saliva sample, Sarah received several reports that she accessed online and printed for her visit with Dr S. quantitative, and normative research on ethical and regulatory issues raised by both biorepository research and pediatric translational and clinical genomics.Esther E. Knapp, MD, MBE is a pediatric hematologist-oncologist at the University of Louisville School of Medicine in Louisville, Kentucky. She completed additional fellowship training in pediatric stem cell transplant medicine. Her research interests as a bioethicist and clinician focus on ethical issues in transplant medicine, pediatric precision oncology, and clinician moral distress.