To cite this article: Pfaar O, van Twuijver E, Boot JD, Opstelten DJE, Klimek L, van Ree R, Diamant Z, Kuna P, Panzner P. A randomized DBPC trial to determine the optimal effective and safe dose of a SLIT-birch pollen extract for the treatment of allergic rhinitis: results of a phase II study. AbstractBackground: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is a potential efficacious and safe treatment option for patients with respiratory, IgE-mediated allergic diseases. A combined tolerability, dose-finding study with a sublingual liquid birch pollen preparation (SB) was conducted. Methods: Two hundred and sixty-nine adults with birch-pollen-induced AR were randomized to placebo, SB: 3333, 10 000, 20 000 or 40 000 AUN/ml. Differences in symptom scores following a titrated nasal provocation test (TNPT) at baseline and after 5 months of treatment were determined. Safety, tolerability, birch-pollen-specific immunoglobulin levels and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) were also measured (all measures determined outside the birch pollen season). Results: In all treatment groups, an improvement in symptom scores after treatment compared to baseline was observed, with an additional stepwise improvement in the active groups compared to placebo, which was significant in high-dose groups (P = 0.008 and P < 0.001, respectively). For this primary endpoint, a significant linear dose-response curve was observed: the higher the dose, the better the improvement observed. Likewise, active treatment resulted in an increase in PNIF and serum IgG levels compared to placebo. The highest improvements were found in the 40 000 AUN/ml group. All active dosages resulted in more adverse reactions than placebo, which were mainly mild and well-controlled. Conclusions: A multicentre trial evaluated the dose-response and tolerability of SB. All active treatment groups showed better responses than placebo for both primary and secondary parameters. The results indicate that, within the studied dose range, SB 40 000 AUN/ml is the most optimal effective and safe dose (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01639768).

RATIONALE: Poorly-controlled asthma is prevalent in the Medicaid Population. Asthma exacerbations are potentially preventable. Primary care providers lack timely data on asthma control status. Outcomes of predictive models depend on an appropriate system of care. METHODS: Parkland Community Health Plan developed a comprehensive intervention including a risk prediction model to define the risk for asthma ED visits or hospitalizations, monthly patient and provider level risk score reports to network providers including patient-level data on risk scores, integrating point of care decision support alerts in the EHR of the largest PCHP provider, and coordinaton of care between PCHP Disease Management and Case Managers, PCP's, and information technology vendors. RESULTS: The intervention included asthmatic children assigned to 17 PCP's caring for about 50% of PCHP members, The risk prediction model had a good accuracy (C-statistic 0.84). Patients were categorized into four risk score levels. Expected ED visit or hospitalization rate was 20%, 10%, 4%, and 1.4%. After introduction of the EHR alert providers increased prescription of controller medication 50% and controller-to-rescue medication orders 57% compared to the prior year. Asthma related ED visit rates decreased by 30% (from 16% to 11%), hospitalization rates by 43% (from 3.44% to 1.97%), and total costs by 40% (from $1285 to $766 per member per year). The asthma medication ratio increased by 15%, from 0.39 to 0.45. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of a predictive model with a care coordiantion system and EHR alerts for asthma patients in a Medicaid HMO resulted in dramatic improvements in outcomes and cost of care.

BackgroundSUBLIVAC FIX Birch (SUB-B) is a liquid oral preparation of Betula verrucosa pollen extract for the treatment of allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjuctivitis induced by birch pollen. The major allergen content of SUB-B and Staloral Birch (Stal-B) have been shown to be comparable. In order to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of both products, the present study was designed to investigate efficacy of treatment with SUB-B compared to Stal-B by means of reduction in allergy symptoms assessed by a titrated nasal provocation test (TNPT) in subjects suffering from IgE mediated allergy complaints triggered by birch pollen.MethodsA prospective, randomized, open, blinded endpoint (PROBE), controlled, single-centre study in 74 birch allergic adults was performed. Treatment consisted of either SUB-B (10,000 AUN/ml) or Stal-B (initial phase 10 I.R./ml and maintenance phase 300 I.R./ml) for 16–20 weeks at maintenance dose. The primary efficacy outcome was defined by the difference in change of the TNPT-threshold dose between the two treatment groups at baseline and after completion of treatment. Secondary outcomes included determination of birch pollen specific IgE and IgG levels, safety lab and ECG. During the first 30 days of treatment, subjects were requested to fill out a diary concerning compliance with study medication, occurrence of AEs and the use of concomitant medication.ResultsAnalysis of the primary efficacy parameter showed that the percentage of subjects showing a beneficial treatment effect was similar in both treatment groups, 33.3% for SUB-B vs. 31.4% for Stal-B in the intention to treat population. Evaluation of the immunologic response, showed that treatment with SUB-B and Stal-B induced similar increases (approximately 2 times) in IgE, IgG and IgG4 specific for Bet v 1.In total, 143 related adverse events (AEs) were reported. The majority of the AEs was of mild intensity. The same pattern of AEs was observed for both products. No clinically relevant changes in other safety parameters, such as safety laboratory parameters, vital signs, physical examination and ECGs were observed.ConclusionTaken together, treatment with both products was effective by means of reduction in allergic symptoms during a TNPT. In addition, safety analysis revealed a good tolerability of both SLIT extracts.

Background: Climatic changes causing early pollen flight and new allergens prolonging the pollen season render up-dosing of allergen-specific subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) outside the pollen season considerably more difficult. In addition, for patients with multiple pollen allergies, patients coming near the beginning of pollen season, and patients who wish to up-dose faster, an accelerated induction regimen would be helpful. Methods: In an open, randomized, parallel group, multicenter safety trial, an accelerated up-dosing regimen (0.1–0.3–0.5 ml in weekly intervals) was compared to conventional up-dosing (0.05–0.1–0.2–0.3–0.4–0.5 ml in weekly intervals) with an allergoid grass pollen SCIT preparation. After up-dosing, the maintenance dose was given in monthly intervals. Results: A total of 146 adult patients with rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis with or without mild asthma (FEV₁ >70%) due to grass pollen were randomized to either the conventional registered up-dosing or an accelerated regimen. In both groups (accelerated regimen, n = 69; conventional regimen, n = 75), a high proportion of patients (92.75 and 92.0%, respectively) successfully reached the maintenance dose without safety concerns. Furthermore, significant increases in specific IgG and IgG₄ after 4 months of treatment were observed in both groups. Conclusion: The accelerated SCIT regimen was found to be as safe as the conventional regimen and might be used to up-dose patients within 2 weeks. Moreover, the immunological effects of both up-dosing regimens were comparable.

MF59-adjuvanted H5N1, cell culture-derived inactivated influenza vaccine (aH5N1c, AUDENZ®, Seqirus) is available for persons 6 months of age and older. During a pandemic, lack of preexisting immunity to novel influenza strains increases morbidity and mortality. This study examined the potential for an adjuvanted vaccine to provide cross-protection to novel viruses. Two similarly designed studies involving separate cohorts aged 18–64 and ≥65 y assessed immune responses to five heterologous H5N1 influenza strains elicited by two 7.5 μg doses of aH5N1c given 3 weeks apart. Geometric mean titers (GMT) on Days 1 and 43 and Day 43/Day 1 geometric mean ratios (GMRs) were determined with hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and microneutralization (MN). Rates of seroconversion (SC) and percentages of subjects with HI and MN ≥ 1:40 were determined. Significant increases in GMTs were observed on Day 43 after vaccination for all 5 heterologous strains in all ages tested. SC rates were 28–55% and 17–46% among those aged 18–64 and ≥65 y, respectively. MN ≥ 1:40 was observed in 38–100% of younger and 37–97% of older subjects, and HI ≥ 1:40 was achieved by 28–64% of subjects aged 18–64 y and by 17–57% of subjects aged ≥65 y. A SC rate ≥40% (97.5% CI) was met for two heterologous strains tested in adults aged 18–64 y. In adults aged 18–64 and ≥65 y, two 7.5 μg doses of aH5N1c demonstrated increased immunogenicity from baseline against five heterologous H5N1 strains, illustrating the potential for aH5N1c to provide cross-protection against other H5N1 strains.