Abstract:In order to progress from the lab to commercial applications it will be necessary to develop industrially scalable methods to produce large quantities of defect-free graphene.Here we show that high-shear mixing of graphite in suitable, stabilizing liquids results in large-scale exfoliation to give dispersions of graphene nanosheets. XPS and Raman spectroscopy show the exfoliated flakes to be unoxidised and free of basal plane defects. We have developed a simple model which shows exfoliation to occur once the local shear rate exceeds 10 4 s -1 . By fully characterizing the scaling behaviour of the graphene production rate, we show that exfoliation can be achieved in liquid volumes from 100s of ml up to 100s of litres and beyond. The graphene produced by this method performs well in applications from composites to conductive coatings. This method can be applied to exfoliate BN, MoS2 and a range of other layered crystals. Main Text:Due to its ultra-thin, 2-dimensional nature and its unprecedented combination of physical properties, graphene has become the most studied of all nano-materials. In the next decade graphene is likely to find commercial applications in many areas from high-frequency electronics to smart coatings.
In order to fulfil their potential for applications, it will be necessary to develop large-scale production methods for two-dimensional (2D) inorganic nanosheets. Here we demonstrate the large-scale shear-exfoliation of molybdenum disulphide nanosheets in aqueous surfactant solution using a kitchen blender. Using standard procedures, we measure how the MoS2 concentration and production rate scale with processing parameters. However, we also use recently developed methods based on optical spectroscopy to simultaneously measure both nanosheet lateral size and thickness, allowing us to also study the dependence of nanosheet dimensions on processing parameters. We found the nanosheet concentration and production rates to depend sensitively on the mixing parameters (the MoS2 concentration, Ci; the mixing time, t; the liquid volume, V; and the rotor speed, N). By optimising mixing parameters, we achieved concentrations and production rates as high as 0.4 mg/ml and 1.3 mg/min respectively. Conversely, the nanosheet size and thickness were largely invariant with these parameters. The nanosheet concentration is also extremely sensitive to the surfactant concentration. However, more interestingly the nanosheet lateral size and thickness also varied strongly with the surfactant concentration. This allows the mean nanosheet dimensions to be controlled during shear exfoliation at least in the range ~40-220 nm for length and ~2-12 layers for thickness. We demonstrate the importance of this by showing that the MoS2 nanosheets prepared using different surfactant concentrations, and so displaying different nanosheets sizes, perform differently when used as hydrogen evolution catalysts. We find the nanosheets produced using high surfactant concentrations, which gives smaller flake sizes, perform significantly better, consistent with catalysis occurring at nanosheet edges. Finally, we also demonstrate that shear exfoliation using a kitchen blender is not limited to MoS2 but can also be achieved for boron nitride and tungsten disulphide. ToC fig3
To facilitate progression from the lab to commercial applications, it will be necessary to develop simple, scalable methods to produce high quality graphene. Here we demonstrate the production of large quantities of defect-free graphene using a kitchen blender and household detergent. We have characterised the scaling of both graphene concentration and production rate with the mixing parameters: mixing time, initial graphite concentration, rotor speed and liquid volume. We find the production rate to be invariant with mixing time and to increase strongly with mixing volume, results which are important for scale-up. Even in this simple system, concentrations of up to 1 mg ml À1 and graphene masses of >500 mg can be achieved after a few hours mixing. The maximum production rate was $0.15 g h À1 , much higher than for standard sonication-based exfoliation methods. We demonstrate that graphene production occurs because the mean turbulent shear rate in the blender exceeds the critical shear rate for exfoliation.Over the last decade, graphene has become one of the most studied of all nano-materials due to its 2-dimensional structure and its unique set of physical properties. 1,2 During this period, the focus of much of the research community has been on mapping out and understanding the fundamental physics and chemistry of graphene. However, in recent years, the emphasis has started to shi slightly towards the demonstration of applications. 3 Over the next few years, we expect the emphasis to shi further as both academic and industrial researchers concentrate on fullling the applications potential of graphene, eventually leading to a range of graphene-enabled products.However, before this can be achieved, it will be critically important to develop industrially scalable production methods for graphene. While graphene can be produced by a range of techniques, many applications will require solution-processed 4 graphene. In particular, a number of applications will require access to large volumes of graphene dispersions or inks. Using standard solution deposition techniques such as inkjet printing 5,6 or spray coating, 7,8 such inks can be used to prepare a range of lms, coatings or patterned structures. In particular, applications in areas such as printed electronics will require the production of conductive lms or traces. Here, defect free graphene performs particularly well, giving high conductivity structures without high temperature post treatments. 5 Thus, it is clear that large scale production techniques for defect-free graphene are urgently required.Defect free graphene is generally produced by sonicating graphite powder either in certain solvents 9-16 or aqueous surfactant 17-23 solutions. The sonication tends to break up the graphite crystallites as well as exfoliating them to give large number of graphene nanosheets. 11 Raman spectroscopy 15,24,25 shows this method to produce negligible quantities of basal plane defects while XPS shows the akes to be un-oxidised. 14 While the graphene produced by this m...
Novel foam composites comprising functionalized graphene (f‐G) and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) were prepared and electrical conductivity and electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding efficiency of the composites with different mass fractions of f‐G have been investigated. The electrical conductivity increases with the increase in concentration of f‐G in insulating PVDF matrix. A dramatic change in the conductivity is observed from 10−16 S · m−1 for insulating PVDF to 10−4 S · m−1 for 0.5 wt.% f‐G reinforced PVDF composite, which can be attributed to high‐aspect‐ratio and highly conducting nature of f‐G nanofiller, which forms a conductive network in the polymer. An EMI shielding effectiveness of ≈20 dB is obtained in X‐band (8–12 GHz) region and 18 dB in broadband (1–8 GHz) region for 5 wt.% of f‐G in foam composite. The application of conductive graphene foam composites as lightweight EMI shielding materials for X‐band and broadband shielding has been demonstrated and the mechanism of EMI shielding in f‐G/PVDF foam composites has been discussed.
Ultrathin graphene (UG) has been prepared by exfoliation of graphite oxide by a novel technique based on focused solar radiation. Graphene based engine oil nanofluids have been prepared and their frictional characteristics (FC), antiwear (AW), and extreme pressure (EP) properties have been evaluated. The improvement in FC, AW, and EP properties of nanofluids is respectively by 80, 33, and 40% compared with base oil. The enhancement can be attributed to the nanobearing mechanism of graphene in engine oil and ultimate mechanical strength of graphene.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.