Since the mid-2000s, recruitment of Walleye Sander vitreus in some northern Wisconsin lakes has declined, potentially because of climate-induced changes in lake environments. Yellow Perch Perca flavescens is also an ecologically and culturally important fish species in this region, but mechanisms driving Yellow Perch recruitment are unclear because of a lack of targeted sampling. Previous studies have suggested that recruitment of these two species may be regulated by similar factors, and observed declines in Walleye recruitment may be cause for concern about Yellow Perch recruitment. Our objectives were to determine if abiotic factors related to recruitment success were similar between Walleye and Yellow Perch populations in northern Wisconsin lakes and if the probability of successful Walleye recruitment was related to estimates of juvenile Yellow Perch abundance before Walleye recruitment declines were observed. We addressed these objectives using historical data from Wisconsin lakes. Random forest analysis incorporating lake-specific averages of predictor variables indicated that winter conditions (duration or severity), growing degree days, variation in spring temperatures, peak summer temperature, and Secchi depth were important predictors of recruitment success for both species. Logistic regression indicated that before Walleye recruitment declines were observed on some lakes (2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006), Walleye recruitment success was related to relative abundance of juvenile Yellow Perch in mini-fyke-net sampling. Our results indicate that landscape-level patterns in recruitment success for the two species are likely similar and additional research to understand Yellow Perch recruitment trends is warranted. Better information on Yellow Perch recruitment could contribute to a better understanding of Walleye recruitment trends as declines in Yellow Perch could influence prey availability and survival of age-0 Walleye. Furthermore,

Muskellunge Esox masquinongy are large, predatory game fish whose association with shallow, complex habitats is well documented, particularly during early life stages. Despite this association, relatively little guidance exists regarding effective sampling of Muskellunge larvae and previous efforts to sample larval Muskellunge have been met with limited success. Therefore, our objective was to determine the relative effectiveness of three sampling gears for capturing naturally produced Muskellunge larvae. Larvae were sampled during 2019 and 2020 at known Muskellunge spawning locations in Snipe Lake, Wisconsin, with D-frame dip nets (1,000-µm mesh), quatrefoil light traps, and towed ichthyoplankton nets (1,000-µm mesh). Sixty larval Muskellunge were captured across all gears, and catches in D-frame dip nets comprised nearly 87% (52 of 60) of the total catch. Furthermore, Dframe dip nets captured the broadest size range of larval Muskellunge (TL range = 14-33 mm). Greater effectiveness of D-frame dip nets in comparison with other gears is likely related to their ability to be used in and around structurally complex habitats without fouling or clogging. Our results suggest that D-frame dip nets should be considered as a cost-and time-effective tool for targeting larval Muskellunge in complex habitats.