In this study, we recruited 40 patients with spinal metastatic disease who were operated at Geneva University Hospitals by the Neurosurgery or Orthopedic teams between the years of 2015 and 2020. We did an ROC analysis in order to determine the accuracy of the SORG ML algorithm and nomogram versus the Tokuhashi Original and Revised Scores.The analysis of data of our independent cohort shows a clear advantage in terms of predictive ability of the SORG ML algorithm and nomogram in comparison with the Tokuhashi scores. The SORG ML had an AUC of 0.87 for 90-days and 0.85 for 1-year. The SORG Nomogram showed a predictive ability at 90-days and 1-year with AUC's of 0.87 and 0.76 respectively.These results showed excellent discriminative ability as compared with the Tokuhashi Original Score which achieved AUC's of 0.70 and 0.69 and the Tokuhashi Revised Score which had AUC's of 0.65 and 0.71 for 3-month and 1-year respectively. The predictive ability of the SORG ML algorithm and nomogram were superior to currently used preoperative survival estimation scores for spinal metastatic disease.

In this study, we recruited 40 patients with spinal metastatic disease who were operated at Geneva University Hospitals by the Neurosurgery or Orthopedic teams between the years of 2015 and 2020. We did an ROC analysis in order to determine the accuracy of the SORG ML algorithm and nomogram versus the Tokuhashi Original and Revised Scores. The analysis of data of our independent cohort shows a clear advantage in terms of predictive ability of the SORG ML algorithm and nomogram in comparison with the Tokuhashi scores. The SORG ML had an AUC of 0.87 for 90-days and 0.85 for 1-year. The SORG Nomogram showed a predictive ability at 90-days and 1-year with AUC’s of 0.87 and 0.76 respectively. These results showed excellent discriminative ability as compared with the Tokuhashi Original Score which achieved AUC’s of 0.70 and 0.69 and the Tokuhashi Revised Score which had AUC’s of 0.65 and 0.71 for 3-month and 1-year respectively. The predictive ability of the SORG ML algorithm and nomogram were superior to currently used preoperative survival estimation scores for spinal metastatic disease.

Spinal canal dimensions may vary according to ethnicity as reported values differ among studies in European and Chinese populations. Here, we studied the change in the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the osseous lumbar spinal canal measured in subjects from three ethnic groups born 70 years apart and established reference values for our local population. This retrospective study included a total of 1050 subjects born between 1930 and 1999 stratified by birth decade. All subjects underwent lumbar spine computed tomography (CT) as a standardized imaging procedure following trauma. Three independent observers measured the CSA of the osseous lumbar spinal canal at the L2 and L4 pedicle levels. Lumbar spine CSA was smaller at both L2 and L4 in subjects born in later generations (p < 0.001; p = 0.001). This difference reached significance for patients born three to five decades apart. This was also true within two of the three ethnic subgroups. Patient height was very weakly correlated with the CSA at both L2 and L4 (r = 0.109, p = 0.005; r = 0.116, p = 0.002). The interobserver reliability of the measurements was good. This study confirms the decrease of osseous lumbar spinal canal dimensions across decades in our local population.