Digital radiographic imaging systems, such as those using photostimulable storage phosphor, amorphous selenium, amorphous silicon, CCD, and MOSFET technology, can produce adequate image quality over a much broader range of exposure levels than that of screen/film imaging systems. In screen/film imaging, the final image brightness and contrast are indicative of over- and underexposure. In digital imaging, brightness and contrast are often determined entirely by digital postprocessing of the acquired image data. Overexposure and underexposures are not readily recognizable. As a result, patient dose has a tendency to gradually increase over time after a department converts from screen/film-based imaging to digital radiographic imaging. The purpose of this report is to recommend a standard indicator which reflects the radiation exposure that is incident on a detector after every exposure event and that reflects the noise levels present in the image data. The intent is to facilitate the production of consistent, high quality digital radiographic images at acceptable patient doses. This should be based not on image optical density or brightness but on feedback regarding the detector exposure provided and actively monitored by the imaging system. A standard beam calibration condition is recommended that is based on RQA5 but uses filtration materials that are commonly available and simple to use. Recommendations on clinical implementation of the indices to control image quality and patient dose are derived from historical tolerance limits and presented as guidelines.

Recommended methods to test the performance of computed radiography (CR) digital radiographic systems have been recently developed by the AAPM Task Group No. 10. Included are tests for dark noise, uniformity, exposure response, laser beam function, spatial resolution, low-contrast resolution, spatial accuracy, erasure thoroughness, and throughput. The recommendations may be used for acceptance testing of new CR devices as well as routine performance evaluation checks of devices in clinical use. The purpose of this short communication is to provide a tabular summary of the tests recommended by the AAPM Task Group, delineate the technical aspects of the tests, suggest quantitative measures of the performance results, and recommend uniform quantitative criteria for the satisfactory performance of CR devices. The applicability of the acceptance criteria is verified by tests performed on CR systems in clinical use at five different institutions. This paper further clarifies the recommendations with respect to the beam filtration to be used for exposure calibration of the system, and the calibration of automatic exposure control systems.

Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and cardiac catheterization are useful adjuncts to echocardiography for delineating cardiovascular anatomy in pediatric patients. These studies require ionizing radiation, and it is paramount to understand the amount of radiation pediatric patients receive when these tests are performed. Modern dosimetry methods facilitate the conversion of radiation doses of varying units into an effective radiation dose. To compare the effective radiation dose between nongated CTA of the chest and diagnostic cardiac catheterization in pediatric patients. This is a retrospective cohort study of patients of patients who underwent either nongated CTA of the chest or diagnostic cardiac catheterization between July 2009 and April 2010. Fifty patients were included in each group as consecutive samples at a single tertiary care center. An effective radiation dose (mSv) was formulated using conversion factors for each group. The median effective dose (ED) for the CTA group was 0.74 mSv compared with 10.8 mSv for the catheterization group (p < 0.0001). The median ED for children <1 year of age in the CTA group was 0.76 mSv compared with 13.4 mSv for the catheterization group (p < 0.0001). Nongated CTA of the chest exposes children to 15 times less radiation than diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Unless hemodynamic data are necessary, CTA of the chest should be considered in lieu of diagnostic cardiac catheterization in patients with known or presumed cardiac disease who need additional imaging beyond echocardiography.

No abstract

The average cancer induction risk in sensitive organs from cardiac CT angiography for our patient cohort was 0.13%, with a female to male cancer induction risk ratio of 2.6.