Macrophage infiltration is a common feature of the early phase of renal ischaemia/reperfusion injury. Indeed, it is generally regarded as the cause of tissue injury in this phase, although it is also clear that it can lead to tissue repair in other phases. In order to ascertain whether macrophages are directly involved in the repair/late phase, which follows the proinflammatory and injury process of renal ischaemia/reperfusion, we used two different approaches based on macrophage depletion. Firstly, we produced renal ischaemia in mice that were previously treated with clodronate liposome. Secondly, during reperfusion we re-injected RAW 264.7 to macrophage-depleted mice 24 h prior to sacrifice. The results showed that regeneration, as evaluated by stathmin and PCNA markers, was macrophagedependent: it was blocked when macrophage depletion was provoked and recovered with macrophage re-injection. The cytokine profile revealed the influence of the inflammatory environment on kidney repair: pro-inflammatory cytokines (MCP-1, MIP-1α) increased during the early stages of reperfusion, coinciding with low regeneration, and the antiinflammatory cytokine IL-10 increased during the longer periods of reperfusion when regeneration was more evident. We conclude that macrophages induce renal regeneration after ischaemia/reperfusion, depending on the inflammatory milieu.
Ischemia/reperfusion injury is a leading cause of acute renal failure triggering an inflammatory response associated with infiltrating macrophages, which determine disease outcome. To repair the inflammation we designed a procedure whereby macrophages that overexpress the anti-inflammatory agent interleukin (IL)-10 were adoptively transferred. These bone marrow-derived macrophages were able to increase their intracellular iron pool that, in turn, augmented the expression of lipocalin-2 and its receptors. Infusion of these macrophages into rats after 1 h of reperfusion resulted in localization of the cells to injured kidney tissue, caused increases in regenerative markers, and a notable reduction in both blood urea nitrogen and creatinine. Furthermore, IL-10 therapy decreased the local inflammatory profile and upregulated the expression of pro-regenerative lipocalin-2 and its receptors. IL-10-mediated protection and subsequent renal repair were dependent on the presence of iron and lipocalin-2, since the administration of a neutralizing antibody for lipocalin-2 or administration of IL-10 macrophages pretreated with the iron chelating agent deferoxamine abrogated IL-10-mediated protective effects. Thus, adoptive transfer of IL-10 macrophages to ischemic kidneys blunts acute kidney injury. These effects are mediated through the action of intracellular iron to induce lipocalin-2.
Inflammatory reactions are initiated to eliminate pathogens, but also to promote repair of damaged tissue after acute inflammation is terminated. In this regard, macrophages play a prominent role during induction as well as resolution of inflammation and injury in various organs including the kidney. The present study describes a mechanism for renal tissue regeneration after ischaemia/reperfusion injury. Following injury, apoptotic cell‐derived sphingosine‐1‐phosphate (S1P) or exogenously administered sphingosine analogue FTY720 activates macrophages to support the proliferation and healing of renal epithelium, once inflammatory conditions are terminated. Both suppression of inflammation and renal regeneration might require S1P receptor 3 (S1P3) signalling and downstream release of neutrophil gelatinase‐associated lipocalin (NGAL/Lcn‐2) from macrophages. Overall, our data point to a macrophage‐dependent S1P‐S1P3‐Lcn‐2 axis that might be beneficial for restoration of kidney function after an ischaemic insult. Copyright © 2011 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.