Cocaine administration upregulates the levels of extracellular glutamate and dopamine in the striatum. Activation of the receptors alters calcium homeostasis in striatal neurons leading to the expression of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress proteins. It was therefore hypothesized that cocaine upregulates the expression of the ER stress proteins, immunoglobulin heavy chain binding protein (BiP), Ire1alpha and perk via glutamate and dopamine receptor activation. A novel glutamate microbiosensor and Western immunoblot analyses were mainly performed to test the hypothesis in the rat dorsal striatum. The results showed that i.p. injection of repeated cocaine (20 mg/kg) for nine consecutive days significantly increased extracellular glutamate levels while acute cocaine injection did not. However, the immunoreactivities (IR) of the ER stress proteins in the dorsal striatum were significantly increased by either acute or repeated cocaine injections as compared with saline controls. Intrastriatal injection (i.s.) of the selective group I metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) antagonist N-phenyl-7-(hydroxyimino)cyclopropa[b]chromen-1a-carboxamide (PHCCC; 25 nmol) or the mGluR5 subtype antagonist 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)pyridine hydrochloride (MPEP; 2 and 25 nmol) significantly decreased repeated cocaine-induced increases in the IR of the ER stress proteins in the injected dorsal striatum. Similarly, the selective D1 antagonist (R)-(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrochloride (SCH23390; 0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) or the N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist dizocilpine/(5S,10R)-(+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-ibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5,10-imine maleate (MK801; 2 nmol, i.s.) decreased acute or repeated cocaine-induced the IR of the ER stress proteins in the dorsal striatum. These data suggest that cocaine upregulates expression of the ER stress proteins in striatal neurons via a mechanism involving activation of glutamate and dopamine receptors.

Lysophosphatidylserine (LPS) may be generated after phosphatidylserine-specific phospholipase A 2 activation. However, the effects of LPS on cellular activities and the identities of its target molecules have not been fully elucidated. In this study, we observed that LPS stimulates an intracellular calcium increase in L2071 mouse fibroblast cells, and that this increase was inhibited by 1-[6-((17␤-3-methoxyestra-1,3,5(10)-trien-17-yl)amino)hexyl]-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dione (U-73122) but not by pertussis toxin, suggesting that LPS stimulates calcium signaling via G-protein coupled receptor-mediated phospholipase C activation. Moreover, LPS-induced calcium mobilization was not inhibited by the lysophosphatidic acid receptor antagonist, (S)-phosphoric acid mono-{2-octadec-9-enoylamino-3-[4-(pyridine-2-ylmethoxy)-phenyl]-propyl} ester (VPC 32183), thus indicating that LPS binds to a receptor other than lysophosphatidic acid receptors. It was also found that LPS stimulates two types of mitogen-activated protein kinase [i.e., extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK) and p38 kinase] in L2071 cells. Furthermore, these LPS-induced ERK and p38 kinase activations were inhibited by pertussis toxin, which suggests the role of pertussis toxin-sensitive G-proteins in the process. In terms of functional issues, LPS stimulated L2071 cell chemotactic migration, which was completely inhibited by pertussis toxin, indicating the involvement of pertussis toxin-sensitive G i protein(s). This chemotaxis of L2071 cells induced by LPS was also dramatically inhibited by 2-(4-morpholinyl)-8-phenyl-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one (LY294002) and by 2Ј-amino-3Ј-methoxyflavone (PD98059). This study demonstrates that LPS stimulates at least two different signaling cascades, one of which involves a pertussis toxin-insensitive but phospholipase C-dependent intracellular calcium increase, and the other involves a pertussis toxin-sensitive chemotactic migration mediated by phosphoinositide 3-kinase and ERK.Lyso-type phospholipid molecules, such as lysophosphatidic acid, sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P), lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), and sphingosylphosphorylcholine (SPC), have attracted the attentions of researchers for more than 2 decades. In particular, the identification of lysophosphatidic acid as a cell proliferating factor in serum proved to be a landmark event, and the involvement of S1P in angiogenesis has been studied intensively (van Corven et al., 1989;Tigyi et al., 1994;Lee et al., 1999). Moreover, the discovery of the EDG family of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) of lysophosphatidic acid and S1P triggered a variety of pathophysiological studies on lysophospholipids in many cell and tissue

Although the level of serum amyloid A has been reported to be up-regulated during inflammatory response, the role of serum amyloid A on the regulation of inflammation and immune response has not been elucidated. We found that serum amyloid A stimulated the production of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and interleukin (IL)-10, which are proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines, respectively, in human monocytes. Low concentrations of serum amyloid A stimulated TNF-alpha production with maximal activity at 6 h after stimulation, whereas high concentrations of serum amyloid A stimulated IL-10 production with maximal activity at 12 h. The activations of the two cytokines by serum amyloid A occurred at both the transcription and translational levels. Signaling events induced by serum amyloid A included the activation of two mitogen-activated protein kinases (extracellular signal-regulated kinase and p38 kinase), which were found to be required for TNF-alpha and IL-10 production, respectively. The stimulation of formyl peptide receptor-like-1-expressing RBL-2H3 cells, but not of vector-expressing RBL-2H3 cells with serum amyloid A, induced mitogen-activated protein kinases activation and the accumulation of the RNAs of these two cytokines. Together, our findings suggest that serum amyloid A modulates contrary immune responses via formyl peptide receptor-like 1, by inducing TNF-alpha or IL-10, and demonstrate that extracellular signal-regulated kinase and p38 kinase play counteracting roles in this process.

No abstract

No abstract