Importance Four assays have been registered with the FDA to detect PD-L1 to enrich for patient response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies. The tests use four separate PD-L1 antibodies on two separate staining platforms and have their own scoring systems which raises questions about their similarity and potential cross-utilization. Objective We compared the performance of four PD-L1 platforms, including two FDA-cleared assays and two laboratory developed tests (LDTs). Design Four serial histology sections from 90 archival NSCLCs were distributed to three sites that performed the following IHCs: 1) 28-8 antibody on Dako Link 48; 2) 22c3 antibody on Dako Link 48; 3) SP142 antibody on Ventana Benchmark; and 4) E1L3N antibody on Leica Bond. Slides were scanned and scored by thirteen pathologists by estimating the percentage of malignant and immune cells expressing PD-L1. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and paired and mixed effects statistical analyses were performed to compare antibodies and pathologists scoring of tumor and immune cells. Results The SP142 Ventana assay was an outlier with a significantly lower mean score of PD-L1 expression in both tumor and immune cells. Pairwise comparisons showed the 28-8 and E1L3N were not significantly different, but that 22c3 showed a slight but statistically significant reduction in tumor cell labeling. Evaluation of ICC between antibodies to quantify inter-assay variability using the average of thirteen pathologists scores for tumor shows very high concordance between antibodies for tumor cell scoring (0.813) and lower levels of concordance for immune cell scoring (0.277). When examining inter-pathologists variability for any single antibody, the concordance between pathologists’ reads for tumor ranged from ICC of 0.83 to 0.88 for each antibody while the ICC from immune cells for each antibody ranged from 0.17 to 0.23. Conclusions The assay using the SP142 antibody is a clear outlier detecting significantly less tumor cell and immune cell PD-L1 expression. Antibody 22c3 shows slight yet statistically significantly lower staining than either 28-8 or E1L3N, but this significance is only detected when using the average of thirteen pathologist scores. Pathologists show excellent concordance when scoring tumor cells stained with any antibody, but poor concordance for scoring immune cell staining.

No abstract

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) are neoplastic mesenchymal proliferations featuring an inflammatory infiltrate composed primarily of lymphocytes and plasma cells. The myofibroblastic cells in some IMTs contain chromosomal rearrangements involving the ALK receptor tyrosine-kinase locus region (chromosome band 2p23). ALK-which is normally restricted in its expression to neural tissues-is expressed strikingly in the IMT cells with 2p23 rearrangements. We now report a recurrent oncogenic mechanism, in IMTs, in which tropomyosin (TPM) N-terminal coiled-coil domains are fused to the ALK C-terminal kinase domain. We have cloned two ALK fusion genes, TPM4-ALK and TPM3-ALK, which encode ϳ95-kd fusion oncoproteins characterized by constitutive kinase activity and tyrosylphosphorylation. Immunohistochemical and molecular correlations, in other IMTs, implicate non-TPM ALK oncoproteins that are predominantly cytoplasmic or predominantly nuclear, presumably depending on the subcellular localization of the ALK fusion partner. Notably, a TPM3-ALK oncogene was reported recently in anaplastic lymphoma, and TPM3-ALK is thereby the first known fusion oncogene that transforms, in vivo, both mesenchymal and lymphoid human cell lineages. (Am J Pathol 2000, 157:377-384)

Clin. Invest. 1994.93:1298-1306

IHC scoring correlates with FISH and may be a useful algorithm in testing ALK+ by FISH in non-small cell lung carcinoma, similar to human epidermal growth factor-2 testing in breast cancer. Further study is needed to validate this approach.