No abstract

BackgroundGeneral emergency physicians provide most pediatric emergency care in the United States yet report more challenges managing emergencies in children than adults. Recommendations for standardized pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) curricula to address educational gaps due to variations in pediatric exposure during emergency medicine (EM) training lack learner input. This study surveyed senior EM residents and recent graduates about their perceived preparedness to manage pediatric emergencies to better inform PEM curricula design.MethodsIn 2021, senior EM residents and graduates from the classes of 2020 and 2019 across eight EM programs with PEM rotations at the same children's hospital were recruited and surveyed electronically to assess perceived preparedness for 42 pediatric emergencies and procedures by age: infants under 1 year, toddlers, and children over 4 years. Preparedness was reported on a 5‐point Likert scale with 1 or 2 defined as “unprepared.” A chi‐square test of independence compared the proportion of respondents unprepared to manage each condition across age groups, and a p‐value < 0.05 demonstrated significance.ResultsThe response rate was 53% (129/242), with a higher response rate from senior residents (65%). Respondents reported feeling unprepared to manage more emergency conditions in infants compared to other age groups. Respondents felt least prepared to manage inborn errors of metabolism and congenital heart disease, with 45%–68% unprepared for these conditions across ages. A heat map compared senior residents to recent graduates. More graduates reported feeling unprepared for major trauma, impending respiratory failure, and pediatric advanced life support algorithms.ConclusionsThis study, describing the perspective of EM senior residents and recent graduates, offers unique insights into PEM curricular needs during EM training. Future PEM curricula should target infant complaints and conditions with lower preparedness scores across ages. Other centers training EM residents could use our findings and methods to bolster PEM curricula.

Objective: Although bacteremia in pediatric oncology patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) is not uncommon, sepsis and mortality are rare. Because of the lack of clinically meaningful decision tools to identify high-risk patients with bacteremia, time to antibiotic administration (TTA) is increasingly considered an important quality and safety measure in the emergency department. Because little evidence exists suggesting that this benchmark is beneficial, we sought to determine whether TTA of 60 minutes or less is associated with improved outcomes. Methods:We retrospectively reviewed patients presenting to a pediatric emergency department with FN from November 2013 to June 2016. Clinical outcomes including mortality, pediatric intensive care unit admission, imaging, fluid resuscitation of 40 mL/kg or greater in the first 24 hours, and length of stay were compared between TTA of 60 minutes or less and more than 60 minutes.Results: One hundred seventy-nine episodes of FN were analyzed. The median TTA was 76 minutes (interquartile range, 58-105). The incidence of bacteremia was higher in patients with TTA of more than 60 minutes (12% vs 2%, P = 0.04), but without impact on mortality, pediatric intensive care unit admission, fluid resuscitation, or median length of stay. The median TTA was not different for those who were and were not bacteremic (91 vs 73 minutes, P = 0.11).Conclusions: Time to antibiotic administration of more than 60 minutes did not increase mortality in pediatric oncology patients with FN. Our study adds to the existing literature that TTA of 60 minutes or less does not seem to improve outcomes in pediatric FN. Further larger studies are required to confirm these findings and determine which features predispose pediatric FN patients to morbidity and mortality.