Objective: To determine whether hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after treatment for breast cancer is associated with increased risk of recurrence and mortality. Design: Retrospective observational study. Participants and setting: Postmenopausal women diagnosed with breast cancer and treated by five Sydney doctors between 1964 and 1999. Outcome measures: Times from diagnosis to cancer recurrence or new breast cancer, to death from all causes and to death from primary tumour were compared between women who used HRT for menopausal symptoms after diagnosis and those who did not. Relative risks (RRs) were determined from Cox regression analyses, adjusted for patient and tumour characteristics. Results: 1122 women were followed up for 0–36 years (median, 6.08 years); 154 were lost to follow‐up. 286 women used HRT for menopausal symptoms for up to 26 years (median, 1.75 years). Compared with non‐users, HRT users had reduced risk of cancer recurrence (adjusted relative risk [RR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43–0.87), all‐cause mortality (RR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.19–0.59) and death from primary tumour (RR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.22–0.72). Continuous combined HRT was associated with a reduced risk of death from primary tumour (RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.12–0.88) and all‐cause mortality (RR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.10–0.73). Conclusion: HRT use for menopausal symptoms by women treated for primary invasive breast cancer is not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer recurrence or shortened life expectancy.
Objective To determine attitudes of parents of children conceived by donor insemination to telling the children of their origin. Design Questionnaire survey, in 1992‐1993, of parents who had had a child by donor insemination at four New South Wales clinics from 1979 to 1990. Setting Three hospital‐based clinics (two public, one private) and a private clinic service. Participants 276 families who altogether had had 420 children by donor insemination. Main outcome measures Number of children told that they had been conceived by donor insemination; parents' intentions, before conceiving and after the birth, of informing the child; and whether other people were informed of the child's origin. Results Of 393 families who could be contacted, 353 agreed to participate and 276 (70%) replied to the questionnaire. Only 22 of the 420 children (5.2%) had been informed of their origin. Before conceiving, 18% of parents (49/273) planned to tell the child. Seventy‐one per cent of families (182/257) had told others of the origin of the child, but 94% (241/257) had not told the child. Of the 29% of families (75/257) who had not told others of the child's origins, none had told the child. As the children grow older, more parents decide not to tell them of their origin. Conclusion Most parents of children conceived by donor insemination do not plan to tell their child, but most of these parents have told others, creating the potential for accidental disclosure. Because of the small number of children who are told of their origin, there may not be a need for government‐regulated donor registers, provided donor insemination units maintain a high standard of record‐keeping.
There were no significant differences in any demographic variables between the users of HRT and the non-users. The same level of QOL was observed between HRT and non-HRT groups in the four domains of well-being. The majority of women with breast cancer recovered to a near normal level of QOL after a 4-year adjustment period, and lead fulfilling lives. This adjustment period cannot be quantified, as individual factors such as emotional, social and financial concerns will differ for each individual.
There were no significant differences in any demographic variables between the users of HRT and the non-users. The same level of QOL was observed between HRT and non-HRT groups in the four domains of well-being. The majority of women with breast cancer recovered to a near normal level of QOL after a 4-year adjustment period, and lead fulfilling lives. This adjustment period cannot be quantified, as individual factors such as emotional, social and financial concerns will differ for each individual.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.