Pathogenic variants in PRRT2, encoding the proline-rich transmembrane protein 2, have been associated with an evolving spectrum of paroxysmal neurologic disorders. Based on a cohort of children with PRRT2-related infantile epilepsy, this study aimed at delineating the broad clinical spectrum of PRRT2-associated phenotypes in these children and their relatives. Only a few recent larger cohort studies are on record and findings from single reports were not confirmed so far. We collected detailed genetic and phenotypic data of 40 previously unreported patients from 36 families. All patients had benign infantile epilepsy and harbored pathogenic variants in PRRT2 (core cohort). Clinical data of 62 family members were included, comprising a cohort of 102 individuals (extended cohort) with PRRT2-associated neurological disease. Additional phenotypes in the cohort of patients with benign sporadic and familial infantile epilepsy consist of movement disorders with paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia in six patients, infantile-onset movement disorders in 2 of 40 individuals, and episodic ataxia after mild head trauma in one girl with bi-allelic variants in PRRT2. The same girl displayed a focal cortical dysplasia upon brain imaging. Familial hemiplegic migraine and migraine with aura were reported in nine families. A single individual developed epilepsy with continuous spikes and waves during sleep. In addition to known variants, we report the novel variant c.843G>T, p.(Trp281Cys) that co-segregated with benign infantile epilepsy and migraine in one family. Our study highlights the variability of clinical presentations of patients harboring pathogenic PRRT2 variants and expands the associated phenotypic spectrum.

No abstract

No abstract

BackgroundPatients carrying pathogenic variants inGNAO1often present with early-onset central hypotonia and global developmental delay, with or without epilepsy. As the disorder progresses, a complex hypertonic and hyperkinetic movement disorder is a common phenotype. A genotype–phenotype correlation has not yet been described and there are no evidence-based therapeutic recommendations.MethodsTo improve understanding of the clinical course and pathophysiology of this ultra-rare disorder, we built up a registry forGNAO1patients in Germany. In this retrospective, multicentre cohort study, we collected detailed clinical data, treatment effects and genetic data for 25 affected patients.ResultsThe main clinical features were symptom onset within the first months of life, with central hypotonia or seizures. Within the first year of life, nearly all patients developed a movement disorder comprising dystonia (84%) and choreoathetosis (52%). Twelve (48%) patients suffered life-threatening hyperkinetic crises. Fifteen (60%) patients had epilepsy with poor treatment response. Two patients showed an atypical phenotype and seven novel pathogenic variants inGNAO1were identified. Nine (38%) patients were treated with bilateral deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus internus. Deep brain stimulation reduced hyperkinetic symptoms and prevented further hyperkinetic crises. The in silico prediction programmes did not predict the phenotype by the genotype.ConclusionThe broad clinical spectrum and genetic findings expand the phenotypical spectrum ofGNAO1-associated disorder and therefore disprove the assumption that there are only two main phenotypes. No specific overall genotype–phenotype correlation was identified. We highlight deep brain stimulation as a useful treatment option in this disorder.

No abstract