The notification procedure of the European Union (EU) for new chemicals requires the application of protocols on physicochemical and toxicological tests for the evaluation of physicochemical properties and probable toxic effects of each notified substance. A computerised database was developed from data sets and toxicological test protocols relating to substance properties responsible for skin and eye irritation/corrosion. To develop specific structure-activity relationship (SAR) models and to find rules for a decision support system (DSS) to predict local irritation/corrosion, physical property data, chemical structure data and toxicological data for approximately 1300 chemicals, each having a purity of 95% or more, were evaluated. The evaluation demonstrated that the lipid solubility and aqueous solubility of a chemical are relevant to, or — in some cases — responsible for, the observed local effects of a substance on the skins and eyes of rabbits. The octanol/water partition coefficient and the measured value of the surface tension of a saturated aqueous solution of the substance give additional information that permits the definition of detailed SAR algorithms that use measured solubility values. Data on melting points and vapour pressure can be used to assess the intensity and duration of local contact with a chemical. Considerations relating to the reactivity of a pure chemical can be based on molecular weight and the nature of the heteroatoms present. With respect to local lesions produced following contact with the skin and eyes of rabbits, the data evaluation revealed that no general “local irritation/corrosion potential” of a chemical can be defined. A variety of mechanisms are responsible for the formation of local lesions on the skin or in the eyes: serious lesions are produced by mechanisms different from those that cause moderate irritation in these organs. In order to develop a DSS that uses the information extracted from the database, chemical main groups were categorised on the basis of their empirical formulae, and rules were defined of the type IF (physicochemical property) A, THEN not (toxic) effect B, based on correlations between specific local effects and measured physicochemical values. Other rules of the type IF substructure A, THEN effect B were developed based on correlations between specific local effects and the submitted structural formulae. Reactive chemical substructures relevant to the formation of local lesions and rules for the prediction of the absence of any skin irritation potential were identified. Proposals are made relating to the development of alternatives to eye irritation testing with rabbits.

An alternative to the oral LD50 test, the acute toxic class (ATC) method (oral), was validated with 20 substances in an international collaborative study with nine laboratories in five countries. The ATC method is a stepwise procedure with the use of three animals per step. It has been designed with three fixed doses (25, 200 and 2000 mg/kg). In general, this testing is sufficient for allocation to the toxicity classes of the majority of the international classification systems currently in use. The selection of testing at additional fixed doses (5, 50 and 500 mg/kg) may be considered if further refinement is necessary or for specific allocation to those international classification systems with a cut-off value of 5 mg/kg. On average, two to four steps are necessary to complete a test. With the ATC method substances can be ranked in a similar or even better manner than with an LD50 test but it uses up to 90% fewer animals, the average being 70% fewer. This also results in substantially fewer moribund/dead animals. The ATC method is based on biometric evaluations that, together with the experimental results, demonstrate that this method is a sensitive and reliable alternative to the LD50 test.

No abstract

In a national collaborative study an alternative to the classical LD50 test--the acute-toxic-class method--was validated. With this testing procedure mortality ranges are determined between defined dose levels that are used for classification and labelling in the European Community. The results were compared with LD50 data obtained from the literature which were categorized according to the defined dose levels. The results of this collaborative study have shown that the acute-toxic-class method allows allocation to the toxicity classes of very toxic, toxic, harmful and unclassified in the same manner as on the basis of the classical LD50 tests. The acute-toxic-class method uses fewer animals and subjects fewer animals to pain and distress than the LD50 test and yields the same information on toxic signs in the treated animals. Identical classifications were obtained by the six participating laboratories in 86% of the tests. This demonstrates that the acute-toxic-class method results in excellent reproducibility in comparison to the classical LD50 test and that this new method is a reliable alternative to the LD50 test.

The acute toxic class method (ATC method) is an alternative to the LD50 test, with the use of substantially fewer animals needed for the classification of substances. Like the classical LD50 test the biometry of the ATC method is based on the probit model. The biometric calculations of the ATC method were carried out not only for the classification categories of the European Union but also for the classification criteria of various countries and organizations, currently in use. It is demonstrated that in comparison with the LD50 test in general the same classification is obtained with the ATC method and with the use of substantially fewer animals. Substances with high slopes are likely to be allocated to the predicted toxicity class in comparison with substances having low slopes, with both the ATC method and the LD50 test. Substances are more likely to be allocated into a lower toxicity class with the LD50 test than with the ATC method.