Summary 20-40% of cancer patients show emotional distress. Psychosocial support should be offered to severely distressed patients. However, little is known about the selection of patients to whom such support should be offered. This study investigated oncologists' ability to identify such patients. In a consecutive series of 298 cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy, distress, perceived social support and desire for supportive counselling were assessed using screening instruments. Simultaneously, 8 oncologists estimated patient distress and need for psychosocial support. A complete set of data was obtained in 80.2% of cases. Concordance of the oncologists' estimation of patient distress and perceived social support with the results of the screening instruments was weak (κ = 0.10 and κ = 0.05). Oncologists recognized the presence of severe distress only in 11 of the 30 severely distressed patients. Correct perception of distress was lower in patients with head and neck cancer and lung cancer and in lower class patients. Oncologists' recommendations for supportive counselling did not correlate with patient distress or the amount of perceived support but rather with progressive disease and less denial behaviour. Our results underline the need for educating oncologists in order to improve their ability to identify patient distress.

BACKGROUND Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is often used by cancer patients. Data on characteristics of users, concomitant psychologic disturbance, and compliance with standard treatment continue to be controversial. Use of and interest in CAM and their correlation with psychologic disturbance, ways of coping with illness, and compliance with standard treatment were examined in this study. METHODS The authors conducted a survey in a consecutive sample of 205 cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy, using a structured questionnaire to record use of and interest in CAM, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Hornheide Questionnaire to assess patient distress and social support, and the Freiburg Questionnaire of Coping with Illness. RESULTS Of the 172 participants, 24.4% (response rate, 83.9%) reported use of CAM, and 31.4% reported not having used but being interested in such methods. Logistic regression analysis including clinical, demographic, and psychologic characteristics as independent variables yielded 3 predictors of use of or interest in CAM: younger age (P = 0.004; odds ratio (OR), 0.96), progressive cancer (P = 0.064; OR, 1.47), and active coping behavior (P = 0.016; OR, 1.65). Patients interested in or using CAM did not show more psychologic disturbance, poorer social support, or less trust in medicine or compliance with radiotherapy than subjects without such interest. CONCLUSIONS Use of CAM by cancer patients is not associated with perceived distress or poor compliance with medical treatment but with active coping behavior. Patients seem to consider CAM as supplementary to standard medical methods and one way of avoiding passivity and of coping with feelings of hopelessness. Cancer 2000;89:873–80. © 2000 American Cancer Society.

No abstract

Results stress the importance of training programs for oncologists in order to improve their ability to detect psychosocial distress in cancer patients and to offer adequate emotional support to them.

No abstract