No abstract

The Genomic Landscape of Uterine Sarcomas Conflict of Interest Statement: DBS has consulted with/accepted honoraria from Pfizer, Loxo Oncology, Lilly Oncology, Vivideon Therapeutics, Illumina and QED Therapeutics. Over the past 2 years, MLH has served on advisory boards for Tesaro and Lilly; has received author royalties from UpToDate; and has served as faculty speaker for Research to Practice. Also, her spouse is employed at Sanofi. B.S.T. reports advisory board activities for Boehringer Ingelheim and honoraria and research funding from Genentech.

The genetic, biologic, and clinical heterogeneity of sarcomas poses a challenge for the identification of therapeutic targets, clinical research, and advancing patient care. Because there are > 100 sarcoma subtypes, in-depth genetic studies have focused on one or a few subtypes. Herein, we report a comparative genetic analysis of 2,138 sarcomas representing 45 pathological entities. This cohort is prospectively analyzed using targeted sequencing to characterize subtype-specific somatic alterations in targetable pathways, rates of whole genome doubling, mutational signatures, and subtype-agnostic genomic clusters. The most common alterations are in cell cycle control and TP53, receptor tyrosine kinases/PI3K/RAS, and epigenetic regulators. Subtype-specific associations include TERT amplification in intimal sarcoma and SWI/SNF alterations in uterine adenosarcoma. Tumor mutational burden, while low compared to other cancers, varies between and within subtypes. This resource will improve sarcoma models, motivate studies of subtype-specific alterations, and inform investigations of genetic factors and their correlations with treatment response.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematologic malignancy. The diagnosis of MM requires ⩾10% clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow or biopsy-proven plasmacytoma, plus evidence of end-organ damage (hypercalcemia, renal failure, anemia, and lytic bone lesions). The definition of MM has recently been expanded to include a ⩾60% clonal plasma cell burden in the bone marrow, serum involved/uninvolved light chain ratio of ⩾100, or more than one focal lesion on magnetic resonance imaging ⩾5 mm in the absence of endorgan damage. MM is an incurable malignancy previously associated with poor survival rates. However, over the past two decades, the introduction of novel treatment options has resulted in a dramatic improvement in response rates and overall survival (OS). The combination of a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulator (IMiD) is the preferred induction treatment for newly diagnosed transplant-eligible MM patients. After induction, high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is still the standard of care for these patients. In patients who are transplant ineligible, dose adjusted IMiDs or proteasome inhibitor-based combinations are the preferred treatment option. With the recent approval of novel drugs like carfilzomib, ixazomib, pomalidomide, panobinostat, and monoclonal antibodies (elotuzumab and daratumumab), as well as improved understanding of risk stratification, management of comorbidities and treatment side effects, clinicians can optimize anti-MM therapy, particularly in relapse/refractory MM patients. In this review, we outline the current therapeutic approach to the management of MM.