SummaryReduced reproduction increases storage and extends lifespan in several animal species. The disposable soma hypothesis suggests this life extension occurs by shifting allocation of ingested nutrients from reproduction to the soma. A great deal of circumstantial evidence supports this hypothesis, but no direct tracking of nutrients has been performed in animals that are long‐lived because of direct reduction in reproduction. Here, we use the stable isotopes to track carbon and nitrogen from ingestion to somatic organs in long‐lived, ovariectomized grasshoppers. Three estimates of somatic storage (viz., quantity of hemolymph storage proteins, amount of femur muscle carbohydrates, and size of the fat body) all doubled upon ovariectomy. In stark contrast, ovariectomy did not increase the proportion of these tissues that were made from recently ingested foods. In other words, the physiology underlying relative allocation to these somatic tissues was not affected by ovariectomy. Thus, at the level of whole tissue storage, these results are consistent with a trade‐off between reproduction and longevity. In contrast, our stable isotope data are inconsistent with the prediction that enhanced storage in ovariectomized females results from a physiological shift in allocation of ingested nutrients.

The disposable soma hypothesis predicts that when reproduction is reduced, life span is increased because more nutrients are invested in the soma, increasing somatic repair. Rigorously testing the hypothesis requires tracking nutrients from ingestion to allocation to the soma or to reproduction. Fruit flies on life-extending dietary restriction increase allocation to the soma "relative" to reproduction, suggesting that allocation of nutrients can be associated with extension of life span. Here, we use stable isotopes to track ingested nutrients in ovariectomized grasshoppers during the first oviposition cycle. Previous work has shown that ovariectomy extends life span, but investment of protein in reproduction is not reduced until after the first clutch of eggs is laid. Because ovariectomy does not affect investment in reproduction at this age, the disposable soma hypothesis would predict that ovariectomy should also not affect investment in somatic tissues. We developed grasshopper diets with distinct signatures of ¹³C and ¹⁵N, but that produced equivalent reproductive outputs. These diets are, therefore, appropriate for the reciprocal switches in diet needed for tracking ingested nutrients. Incorporation of stable isotopes into eggs showed that grasshoppers are income breeders, especially for carbon. Allocation to the fat body of nitrogen ingested as adults was slightly increased by ovariectomy; this was our only result that was not consistent with the disposable soma hypothesis. In contrast, ovariectomy did not affect allocation of nitrogen to femoral muscles. Further, allocation of carbon to the fat body or femoral muscles did not appear to be affected by ovariectomy. Total anti-oxidant activities in the hemolymph and femoral muscles were not affected by ovariectomy. These experiments showed that allocation of nutrients was altered little by ovariectomy in young grasshoppers. Additional studies on older individuals are needed to further test the disposable soma hypothesis.