Dear Editor, delayed gastric emptying due to bilateral vagotomy after esophagectomy, has been associated with increased aspiration rates, prolonged hospital stay and impaired quality of life. A pyloric drainage procedure in an effort to reduce its incidence, most commonly a pyloroplasty, represented for years a standard part of distal esophagectomy. This trend has been reevaluated nowadays and the question that still remains open is whether we should further keep on draining pylorus during esophagectomy or not. Surgical pyloric drainage (pyloroplasty/pyloromyotomy), although effective, is directly related to respectable complication rates, such as leakage, bile reflux, dumping sydrome or even postoperative stenosis, with potential fatal outcome. There are several proposed techniques for performing a pyloroplasty nowadays. Heineke- Mikulicz variant is the most widely practiced pyloroplasty (in contrary to Finney or Jaboulay alternatives) and is ideally performed via a 5-cm-long fullthickness antroduodenal longitudinal incision. Pyloroplasty can also be safely performed with a circular or linear stapler, while laparoscopic assisted trans-oral stapled pyloroplasty is also feasible (1).

Cirrhosis has a strong association with abdominal wall hernias, especially in the presence of concomitant ascites. Major predisposing factors for hernia formation in this particular group of patients include increased intra-abdominal pressure and decreased muscle mass due to poor nutrition. Management of these patients is highly challenging and requires an experienced multidisciplinary surgical and medical approach. The aim of our review is to clarify crucial diagnostic and management approaches. Crucial medical and technical issues on this topic are widely discussed with special focus on indication, timing, and type of surgical repair, with an additional reference to the actual role of laparoscopy.