This research examined how mental imagery practice can increase future selfcontinuity to reduce procrastination. A total of 193 undergraduate students were randomly assigned to a present-focused meditation or to a future selffocused mental imagery condition. Participants in both conditions were asked to listen to their respective audio recording twice per week for four consecutive weeks and to complete a pre-intervention, half-point, and post-intervention questionnaire. At the four-week mark, hierarchical regression analyses revealed that both future self-continuity and empathic perspective taking were significantly higher for the mental imagery condition than the meditation condition. While vividness of future self moderated change in future selfcontinuity, affective empathy for future self mediated the relation between vividness of future self and future self-continuity. Lastly, only empathic perspective taking was a significant moderator of change in procrastination across time. The influence of empathy and future self-continuity on procrastination is discussed.
Daydreaming-also understood as a decoupling of attention from the external environment to internal environment-relates to human experience in a variety of ways (e.g., task performance, emotions, psychological well-being, social connection). In this dissertation, I propose that certain daydreams follow principles of association, such that mental elements should be prompted by unique and salient information from the external environment. In turn, daydreams formed through association should be specific and emotionally intense. I also propose that certain daydreams follow principles of narrative processing, such that mental elements should be prompted by more general self-related information such as goals and life stories. In turn, daydreams formed through narrative processing should be organized in a temporally coherent way, follow a common theme, and elicit meaning-making (i.e., connecting experiences to the self). Because of their more integrative presentation of selfrelated information, I propose that narrative daydreams will have a greater influence on the self-concept than associative daydreams. Three hundred and six participants across two experiments completed a modified sustained attention task with ten random daydreaming probes. Participants were randomly assigned to either an associative or narrative condition. The manipulation in each condition differed across experiments, yet all manipulations aimed to influence daydream content to be more associative or more narrative, respectively. Associative and narrative daydream elements were then assessed through self-report measures, and by coding written daydream descriptions. Results of exploratory factor analyses revealed an emotional and self-related factor (close to theorized associative daydreams) and a realistic narrative factor for self-rated items, and associative and narrative daydream factors for coder-rated items. Multilevel growth curve analyses of these factors iii demonstrated that daydreams did not follow an associative or narrative structure based on condition (as hypothesized), but instead, varied in an idiosyncratic manner over probes. Finally, multiple regression analyses revealed that self-rated realistic narrative daydreams positively predicted increases in self-consciousness and private self-consciousness in both experiments. However, none of the daydream factors were significantly related to selfconcept clarity or self-esteem. This suggests that daydreams that follow a narrative sequence may bring about awareness to the self. However, different processes may need to come into play to take the narratives generated through daydreaming and incorporate them into stable evaluations and knowledge of self (i.e., self-esteem and self-concept clarity). Future research and implications are discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.