Background: Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are perceived to be more vulnerable to worse COVID-19 infection outcome. Furthermore, severe shortage in hydroxychloroquine supply was experienced. Objective: We presented the psychological responses of Filipino SLE and RA patients to the COVID-19 pandemic and shortage of hydroxychloroquine supply. Methods: A total of 512 completed online surveys from SLE and RA patients were gathered from May 19 to 26, 2020. The online survey collected data on socio-demographics, health status, contact history, health service utilization, use of hydroxychloroquine, COVID-19 knowledge and concerns, precautionary measures, information needs, the validated Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R) and Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS-21) ratings. Results: The psychological impact of COVID-19 outbreak was at least moderate in 20%. The mean IES-R score was higher among SLE (22.34, SD=14.39) than RA (18.85, SD=13.24) patients. Stress, anxiety and depression were moderate to severe in 12.3%, 38.7%, and 27.7% of respondents. The mean stress subscale score was 10.11 (SD=7.95), mean anxiety subscale score was 6.79 (SD=6.57) and mean depression subscale score was 9.03 (SD=8.77). The risk factors for adverse mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic include the presence of comorbidity of hypertension and asthma; being a healthcare worker; and presence of specific symptoms of myalgia, cough, breathing difficulty, dizziness and sore throat. The protective factors for mental health during the pandemic include satisfaction with available health information and wearing of face masks. Conclusion: In the third month of the pandemic in the Philippines, 20% of the respondents with lupus and RA experienced moderate to severe psychological impact. There was moderate to severe anxiety in 38.7% and moderate to severe depression in 27%. Identification of factors that affect mental health in lupus and RA is useful in implementation of effective psychological support strategies.

ObjectiveWhile COVID-19 vaccination prevents severe infections, poor immunogenicity in immunocompromised people threatens vaccine effectiveness. We analysed the clinical characteristics of patients with rheumatic disease who developed breakthrough COVID-19 after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2.MethodsWe included people partially or fully vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 who developed COVID-19 between 5 January and 30 September 2021 and were reported to the Global Rheumatology Alliance registry. Breakthrough infections were defined as occurring ≥14 days after completion of the vaccination series, specifically 14 days after the second dose in a two-dose series or 14 days after a single-dose vaccine. We analysed patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics and COVID-19 symptoms and outcomes.ResultsSARS-CoV-2 infection was reported in 197 partially or fully vaccinated people with rheumatic disease (mean age 54 years, 77% female, 56% white). The majority (n=140/197, 71%) received messenger RNA vaccines. Among the fully vaccinated (n=87), infection occurred a mean of 112 (±60) days after the second vaccine dose. Among those fully vaccinated and hospitalised (n=22, age range 36–83 years), nine had used B cell-depleting therapy (BCDT), with six as monotherapy, at the time of vaccination. Three were on mycophenolate. The majority (n=14/22, 64%) were not taking systemic glucocorticoids. Eight patients had pre-existing lung disease and five patients died.ConclusionMore than half of fully vaccinated individuals with breakthrough infections requiring hospitalisation were on BCDT or mycophenolate. Further risk mitigation strategies are likely needed to protect this selected high-risk population.

Background: Gout is the most prevalent inflammatory arthritis in the Asia-Pacific region and worldwide. This clinical practice guideline (CPG) aims to provide recommendations based on systematically obtained evidence and values and preferences tailored to the unique needs of patients with gout and hyperuricemia in Asia, |LORENZO Et aL. | INTRODUC TI ONGout is the most prevalent inflammatory arthritis in the Asia-Pacific region and worldwide. 1 Its prevalence increased steadily in various countries: 2.7% in the 1990s to 3.9% in early 2000 in the United States and from 3.4 per 1000 in 2007 to 7.6 per 1000 persons in 2015 in Korea. 2,3 The prevalence is higher in certain ethnic groups.The risk for tophi formation tends to be higher after controlling for age, gender, hypertension, diuretic use, and kidney function. 4 Varying prevalence across ethnic groups indicates that genetics affects its development and the individual's risk when exposed to environmental or dietary variables. 5,6 Despite scientific advancements, disease control of gout is suboptimal. 2,3 Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) from Western and several Asian countries have provided recommendations for the management of gout. [7][8][9] However, the need to formulate unified Asia-Pacific recommendations was recognized. This CPG aims to provide evidence-based recommendations in managing gout in its different phases: asymptomatic hyperuricemia, acute gout, intercritical gout, and chronic tophaceous or complicated gout. It covers both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions (NPI) with consideration of the unique needs of patients with gout in Asia, Australasia, and the Middle East. The target users of these guidelines are general practitioners and specialists, including rheumatologists, in different clinical settings in these regions. | G UIDELINE DE VELOPMENT ME THODSThe Steering Committee (SC) formed the guideline development working groups (GDG), formulated the guideline questions (Table 1) in PICO (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome) format, and oversaw the CPG processes (Figure 1). The Technical Working Group (TWG) appraised and summarized the evidence, applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to determine the certainty of evidence, and drafted the recommendations.The Consensus Panel (CP) was composed of 9 key stakeholders (rheumatologists, general practitioners, academicians, and a patient representative) from Australia,

No abstract

We described a large cohort of Filipino OA patients. Clinical characteristics show more women than men, with knees as the most common and hips as the least involved joints. Medical management was based on a local practice guideline. Compared to the literature, this cohort had more overweight than obese subjects and low surgical referral. A coordinated registry with orthopedics and physiatry departments is currently underway.