Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry has recently emerged as a popular solution to obtain certain products necessary in linear projects, such as orthoimages or digital surface models. This is mainly due to its ability to provide these topographic products in a fast and economical way. In order to guarantee a certain degree of accuracy, it is important to know how many ground control points (GCPs) are necessary and how to distribute them across the study site. The purpose of this work consists of determining the number of GCPs and how to distribute them in a way that yields higher accuracy for a corridor-shaped study area. To do so, several photogrammetric projects have been carried out in which the number of GCPs used in the bundle adjustment and their distribution vary. The different projects were assessed taking into account two different parameters: the root mean square error (RMSE) and the Multiscale Model to Model Cloud Comparison (M3C2). From the different configurations tested, the projects using 9 and 11 GCPs (4.3 and 5.2 GCPs km−1, respectively) distributed alternatively on both sides of the road in an offset or zigzagging pattern, with a pair of GCPs at each end of the road, yielded optimal results regarding fieldwork cost, compared to projects using similar or more GCPs placed according to other distributions.

In the field of geosciences and engineering, situations arise where special attention have to be paid to the planning of the UAV-photogrammetric project, i.e., terrain with complex geometry and steep slopes. The use of off-nadir imagery and flights at a fixed height above ground level (AGL) are postulated as possible factors to be considered to achieve high accuracies. The objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of image angle, frontal and side overlaps, and type of flight (above mean sea level (AMSL) or AGL), on the accuracy of the dense 3 D point cloud yielded by UAV-SfM. The results obtained showed that imagery with an angle between 20° and 35° in two perpendicular flight line directions, 90/90, 90/70 or 70/70 overlap and AGL flight is the optimal combination for best accuracy and high precision. With nadir imagery, the combination of factors that gives the most accuracy results are AGL flights with a 90/70 overlap.