AimsThe aim of the present study was to describe a 10 years single-centre experience in pacing and defibrillating leads removal using an effective and safe modified mechanical dilatation technique.Methods and resultsWe developed a single mechanical dilating sheath extraction technique with multiple venous entry site approaches. We performed a venous entry site approach (VEA) in cases of exposed leads and an alternative transvenous femoral approach (TFA) combined with an internal transjugular approach (ITA) in the presence of very tight binding sites causing failure of VEA extraction or in cases of free-floating leads. We attempted to remove 2062 leads [1825 pacing and 237 implantable cardiac defibrillating (ICD) leads; 1989 exposed at the venous entry site and 73 free-floating] in 1193 consecutive patients. The VEA was effective in 1799 leads, the TFA in 28, and the ITA in 205; in the overall population, we completely removed 2032 leads (98.4%), partially removed 18 (0.9%), and failed to remove 12 leads (0.6%). Major complications were observed in eight patients (0.7%), causing three deaths (0.3%).ConclusionMechanical single sheath extraction technique with multiple venous entry site approaches is effective, safe, and with a good cost effective profile for pacing and ICD leads removal.
AimsAim of this study was to compare a minimally fluoroscopic radiofrequency catheter
ablation with conventional fluoroscopy-guided ablation for supraventricular tachycardias
(SVTs) in terms of ionizing radiation exposure for patient and operator and to estimate
patients' lifetime attributable risks associated with such exposure.Methods and resultsWe performed a prospective, multicentre, randomized controlled trial in six
electrophysiology (EP) laboratories in Italy. A total of 262 patients undergoing EP
studies for SVT were randomized to perform a minimally fluoroscopic approach (MFA)
procedure with the EnSiteTMNavXTM navigation system or a
conventional approach (ConvA) procedure. The MFA was associated with a significant
reduction in patients' radiation dose (0 mSv, iqr 0–0.08 vs. 8.87 mSv, iqr 3.67–22.01;
P < 0.00001), total fluoroscopy time (0 s, iqr 0–12 vs. 859 s, iqr
545–1346; P < 0.00001), and operator radiation dose (1.55 vs. 25.33
µS per procedure; P < 0.001). In the MFA group, X-ray was not used
at all in 72% (96/134) of cases. The acute success and complication rates were not
different between the two groups (P = ns). The reduction in patients'
exposure shows a 96% reduction in the estimated risks of cancer incidence and mortality
and an important reduction in estimated years of life lost and years of life affected.
Based on economic considerations, the benefits of MFA for patients and professionals are
likely to justify its additional costs.ConclusionThis is the first multicentre randomized trial showing that a MFA in the ablation of
SVTs dramatically reduces patients' exposure, risks of cancer incidence and mortality,
and years of life affected and lost, keeping safety and efficacy.Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01132274.
Culture of the leads offers the possibility of an aetiological diagnosis in the majority of cases. When material from the pocket can be obtained, the microbiological result is often consistent with that from the electrodes, while species isolated from blood cultures are often different and more likely to be the result of contamination. Cardiac implantable electronic device infection is more often monomicrobial, CoNS are most frequently isolated and S. epidermidis is largely the main single agent. Very early infections were associated with S. aureus infection. The pattern of susceptibility to antimicrobials is in general that of community-acquired infections, although oxacillin resistance and quinolones resistance has increased in the last 5 years.
Our study suggests that CS leads, after medium-term implantation, can be effectively and safely removed using MD with polypropylene sheaths, in the case of unsuccessful LT. No pre-operative elements predictive of LT failure could be identified. Areas of adherence were rarely located in the CS or its tributaries.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.