Chronic urticaria is a distressing condition with high costs. The aim of this literature review was to assess the relative frequency of causes of chronic urticaria in childhood and to provide guidance on which laboratory tests should be performed. Using PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases, the literature from 1966 to 2010 (week 25) was systematically reviewed. Data from studies conducted on children who had had urticaria for at least 6 weeks, and assessing at least 3 different causes of urticaria, were analysed by reviewers using independent extraction. Six studies, all of low quality, met the inclusion criteria. Idiopathic and physical urticaria were common. Infections, autoimmunity and allergy were also reported. We conclude that children with chronic urticaria not caused by physical stimuli should undergo tests for allergy or infections only when there is a history of cause-effect correlation. High-quality trials are warranted to evaluate the causes of chronic urticaria in childhood.

No abstract

The use of multiple allergens for SLIT does not increase the rate of side-effects in children.

Sublingual-specific immunotherapy (SLIT) is considered as a valid treatment of respiratory allergies. However, there are few data on large sample size regarding its clinical role in 'real life' in term of reduction of symptoms, rescue medications and prevention of asthma in patients suffering from allergic rhinitis (AR) especially in children. We performed a multicenter, case-control study to evaluate the effect of SLIT in children (age 6-18 yr) with intermittent or persistent AR. 171 children (27% girls and 73% boys) with AR due to seasonal or perennial allergens were enrolled in a multicenter case-control study. Cases (n = 90) were defined as patients with intermittent (64%) or persistent (36%) AR who were treated for at least two consecutive years with specific SLIT with the related allergen extracts (SLITone ALK-Abellò). Controls (n = 81) were defined as sex-age- and type of allergen matched AR children who were never treated with specific immunotherapy and had no asthmatic symptoms at the beginning of observation period. Main outcomes of the study were the rhinoconjunctivitis symptom score (SS) (sneezing, rhinorrea, nasal itch, congestion, ocular itch and watery eyes) with a ranging scale from 0 (=no symptoms) to 3 (=severe symptoms) and the medication score (MS) evaluating symptomatic drug intake (antihystamine and inhaled corticosteroids). SS and MS were evaluated at the end of the observational period in relation with the period, considering the last 12 months, in which patients suffered the highest symptoms levels (i.e., peak of relevant pollen season (seasonal AR) or during the period of maximum allergen exposure in case of perennial AR). Secondary outcome of the study was the development of asthma symptoms during the observation period. SS (mean +/- SD) was 4.5 +/- 2.5 in cases and 9.0 +/- 3.0 in controls (-50%) (p = 0.0001). MS (mean +/- SD) was 2.5 +/- 1.9 and 3.6 +/- 2.1 in the case and control groups, respectively (-31%) (p = 0.0001). At the end of the observation period asthma symptoms were present in 14 subjects in the case group (15%) and in 20 children (24%) in the control group (p = 0.13). New skin sensitizations appeared in 6% of cases (n = 2) and in 36% (n = 12) of the controls (p = 0.001). The EFESO trial shows that a 2-yr once daily SLIT treatment in children with intermittent or persistent AR is associated with lower symptom and medication scores in comparison with subjects treated with symptomatic drugs only.

There is now an increasing body of evidence to support the practice of allergen-specific sublingualswallow immunotherapy (SLIT) in the treatment of IgE-mediated respiratory allergies. Recent studies on traditional injection therapy have pointed out that this form of treatment is not only capable to decrease actual allergic symptoms, but may also have long-term clinical and preventive effects and may influence atopy natural history. In the year 2000, our group published a retrospective, multicenter study showing the efficacy and safety of SLIT in a survey of 302 patients. We now carried out a second study on the same patients, with the aim of investigating long-term and preventive effects of SLIT. Beside the well-known safety and efficacy of this treatment (80.8 % of patients reported clinical benefits), SLIT proved also to elicit long term clinical effects: over a mean follow-up of 11.6 months after the end of treatment, 80.8 % of patients stilI mantained the previously achieved benefits. During the follow-up period, only 1% of nonasthma patients reported an onset of respiratory symptoms, and only 9.6 % of patients undergoing new skin tests showed new sensitizations. All the clinical benefits were strongly linked to the length of treatment: patients with long-lasting benefits were treated for a mean length of 29.1 months, while patients showing a return to pre-SLIT condition were treated for a mean 13.3 months. SLIT can obtain long-term and preventive effects so far attributed to injection immunotherapy.