Aims To examine the medication adherence among old persons living in their own homes, to assess their knowledge of their medication, and to indicate target areas for intervention. Methods A cross-sectional study of data collected from randomly selected samples of 348 persons, aged 75 years recruited from a population-based register in the municipality of Aarhus, Denmark. Information on all drugs was collected from the subjects during a home visit, and their drug storage was examined. Information was collected from the general practitioners (GP). The measures of adherence were scores of agreements between the GPs' lists and the subjects' actual drug consumption. Results We found disagreement between the drug information collected from the study population and from the GPs: concerning drugs in 22% of the study-population, concerning doses in 71%, and concerning regimens prescribed by the GP in 66%. Twenty-four percent stated that they did not always follow prescriptions. Most of the deviations from prescriptions were toward lower doses and less frequent drug intake. The drugs most often involved in deviations were hypnotics, analgesics, bronchodilators and diuretics. Sixty percent of the participants knew the purpose of medication, and 21% knew the consequences of omission of the drugs. Less than 6% of the subjects knew about the toxic risks, side-effects, or potential drug interactions. The participants' knowledge of the drugs was positively associated with their adherence. We found a correlation between an increased number of prescribed frequency of drug intake per day and deviation from the regimen (r=0.25, P=0.01). There was a positive association between nonadherence and the use of three or more drugs (odds ratio (OR) 2.5; 95% con®dence interval (CI) 1.5,4.1), prescriptions from more than one doctor (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.3,4.8), and probability of dementia (OR 9.0; 95% CI 1.1,72.5). Moreover compliance aids facilitated adherence (OR 4.4; 95% CI 1.6,12.3). Persons living alone were more prone to medication errors (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.1,3.5). Conclusions A differentiated evaluation of adherence by considering the drug, the dose, and the regimen separately produced quanti®able data concerning the subjects' medication habits. Non-adherence ranged from 20 to 70% depending on the measuring method. The participants' knowledge of the treatment was poor. Our results suggest that better information on medication and the use of compliance aids may prevent nonadherence. Special attention should be paid to persons receiving three or more drugs, living alone, receiving drugs from other doctors, and to persons with predementia symptoms, as they are at higher risk of nonadherence.
Seven patients with acutely elevated diastolic blood pressure (DBP greater than or equal to 135 mmHg) were treated with repeated injections of diazoxide 1 mg/kg body weight i.v. at 10-min intervals. If the DBP was not reduced to 110 mmHg or less after 5 injections, a dose of 5 mg/kg was given. Serum diazoxide (total and unbound) was determined by high pressure liquid chromatography. In all the patients it was possible to reduce the blood pressure to a satisfactory level (i.e. DBP less than 110 mmHg). The individual plasma diazoxide concentrations necessary to achieve the desired response ranged from 20 to 85 micrograms/ml. A significant correlation was found between the initial venous concentration and the initial reduction in blood pressure (p less than 0.02). A high initial concentration in venous blood was associated with high protein binding ("transport function", p less than 0.05), and so were the elimination half-lives, which ranged from 14.7 to 61.3 h ("depot function", p less than 0.05). It is concluded that the previously recommended therapy of injection of 5 mg/kg as a bolus should be given only to patients who do not respond to small repeated doses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.