No abstract

It could be said that the HTP had an impact on units for improved access to health care services. Although this access increased the consumption of pharmaceuticals in units, the policies implemented were successful in controlling pharmaceutical expenditures.

BackgroundAll international guidelines suggested that Tenofovir and Entecavir are the primary drugs at the first line therapy for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, in Turkey these medications reimbursed at the second line therapy according to the Healthcare Implementation Notification. The aim of this study is to compare the cost effectiveness of oral antiviral treatment strategies in CHB for Turkey using lamuvidine, telbuvidine, entecavir, and tenofovir as medications.MethodsThe analysis was conducted using Markov models. The analysis scenarios based on first line treatment options with Lamuvidine, Telbuvidine, Entecavir, and Tenofovir as the medications. In the analysis, inadequate response or resistance after receiving 12 months of the treatment with Entecavir and Telbivudine were compared to the results found from switching from Entecavir to Tenofovir or from switching from Telbuvidine to Tenofovir. In additional, inadequate response or resistance after receiving 6 months of the treatment for Lamivudine was compared to the results found from switching from Lamivudine to Tenofovir. The study population included men and women, who were 40 years of age. The patients` compliance was estimated 100 % for all of the therapy options. The model duration was constructed to evaluate, treatment strategy duration of 40 years. The cost of medications, examinations/follow-ups and complications were included in the model. Years of Potential Life Lost was used as the health outcome. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio analysis has been conducted.Results and discussionWhile the minimum years of life lost was found as 0.22 with tenofovir treatment in 5 years, treatment cost was calculated as 12,169 TL. These values were detected as 0.56 years and 7727 TL, 0.37 years and 12,770 TL, respectively for lamuvidine and telbuvidine treatments. The maximum years of life lost and treatment cost was with lamuvidine treatment were detected as 1.60 years and 18,813 TL and, secondly 0.89 years and 24,007 TL for lamuvidine-tenofovir treatment during 10 years. The minimum years of life lost and cost are 0.54 year and 35,821 TL for tenofovir treatment during 10 years. The minimum years of life lost and cost were determined as 1.21 years and 52,839 TL for tenofovir treatment strategy during 20 years. During 30 years period, tenofovir treatment was found to have the minimum years of life lost (1.73 years) and minimum cost (84,149 TL). When the results of 40 years period were analyzed, years of life lost and costs are 2.06 years and 119,604 TL, 2.13 years and 162,115 TL, 2.13 years and 161,642 TL, 6.52 years and 147,245 TL, 3.20 years and 132,157 TL, 4.10 years and 151,059 TL and 3.05 years and 138,182 TL for tenofovir, entecavir, entecavir-tenofovir, lamuvidine, lamuvidine-tenofovir, telbivudine and telbivudine-tenofovir.ConclusionsIn the model presented in this study, in cost effectiveness analysis about CHB treatments, Tenofovir was found to be one of the cost effective methods in comparison with other treatment strategie...

OBJECTIVE: Infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the causative agent of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), is a major global health problem. Patients with HIV can live normal lives with today’s new treatment options. As the treatment is generally successful, the life expectancy of patients infected with HIV is rising. As a result, the economic burden of HIV treatment on health systems is set to increase. According to the Ministry of Health, there were more than 6000 HIV-positive patients in Turkey in 2013. The aim of this study was to determine the direct costs of HIV treatment in Turkey.METHOD: A retrospective data analysis was performed from the reimbursement agency perspective. Data for 252 patients at a university hospital in Ankara from 2001 to 2012 were used for the analysis. The average costs of treatment per HIV patient and the average costs per HIV patient, depending on the state of the patient’s health, were calculated. The latter was determined according to the number of CD4 cells/ml, as defined by the CDC’s classification system for HIV infection. The cost of treatment was calculated based on published reimbursement prices in 2013, per patient per year.RESULTS: The CD4 values of 25.3%, 29%, and 45.7% of the 252 patients were <100 cells/mm3, 100–300 cells/mm3, and >300 cells/mm3, respectively. The treatment costs per patient per year for 2013 for those with CD4 values of <100 cells/ mm3, 100–300 cells/mm3, and >300+ cells/mm3 were $ 5,637.04, $ 2,211.54, and $ 2,182.35, respectively. The weighted average of the treatment cost per patient was $ 3,344.64 for 2013.CONCLUSION: This analysis is unique to Turkey and calculates the cost only of HIV treatment in Turkey. Lower CD4 values are associated with higher treatment costs. Appropriate HIV treatment is crucial for controlling CD4 values and lowering the treatment costs of HIV patients. These findings need to be considered by policy makers who may need to focus on HIV.

Spain has been a parliamentary monarchy since 1978. Political devolution to regional governments has been incrementally implemented over the last 30 years. Thus, the political organization of the Spanish state is made up of the central state and 17 highly decentralized regions (termed Comunidades Autónomas, that is, Autonomous Communities) with their respective governments and parliaments (Figure 1). With a population of 46,468,102 (December 2016), Spain covers 505,370 km 2 and has the third largest surface area in Western Europe (Table 1). The fertility rate is one of the lowest in the EU (1.27 children per woman in 2014). The inflow of migrant population, especially in the last decade, has had a demographic impact in rejuvenating a population that is otherwise rapidly ageing. Life expectancy in Spain is one of the highest in Europe: 85.5 for women and 82.8 for men in 2015. The top three causes of death in Spain since 1970 have been: cardiovascular diseases, cancer and respiratory diseases, albeit there has been a steady decrease in the actual mortality rates from these causes. Still, mortality rates for these causes are among the lowest in the WHO European Region. Maternal and child health indicators (neonatal, perinatal and maternal mortality rates) have experienced a dramatic improvement, current rates scoring below European averages. Regarding lifestyle factors affecting health status, the proportion of daily smokers has been declining, though regular alcohol consumption is quite widespread and hazardous drinking affects some 7% of men and 3% of women. Obesity and overweight is increasing, doubling the 1987 rate for adult population to reach 15.6%.