No abstract

The Valsalva manoeuvre (VM), a forced expiratory effort against a closed airway, has a wide range of applications in several medical disciplines, including diagnosing heart problems or autonomic nervous system deficiencies. The changes of the intrathoracic and intra-abdominal pressure associated with the manoeuvre result in a complex cardiovascular response with a concomitant action of several regulatory mechanisms. As the main aim of the reflex mechanisms is to control the arterial blood pressure (BP), their action is based primarily on signals from baroreceptors, although they also reflect the activity of pulmonary stretch receptors and, to a lower degree, chemoreceptors, with different mechanisms acting either in synergism or in antagonism depending on the phase of the manoeuvre. A variety of abnormal responses to the VM can be seen in patients with different conditions. Based on the arterial BP and heart rate changes during and after the manoeuvre several dysfunctions can be hence diagnosed or confirmed. The nature of the cardiovascular response to the manoeuvre depends, however, not only on the shape of the cardiovascular system and the autonomic function of the given patient, but also on a number of technical factors related to the execution of the manoeuvre including the duration and level of strain, the body position or breathing pattern. This review of the literature provides a comprehensive analysis of the physiology and pathophysiology of the VM and an overview of its applications. A number of clinical examples of normal and abnormal haemodynamic response to the manoeuvre have been also provided.

Summary. Five different methods of analysing R-R interval (heart rate) variation were compared, using a computer technique, in 61 diabetics with a wide range of responses to autonomic function testing. Two methods differentiated best between the diabetics with and without autonomic damage: (1) the standard deviation of the mean R-R interval recorded for 5 min during quiet breathing with the subject either sitting or standing; (2) the difference between the maximum and minimum heart rates recorded over 1 min during deep breathing at six breaths per minute, again with the subject either sitting or standing. For routine clinical usage we conclude that recording the heart rate for 1 min on an ECG, while the subject sits and breaths deeply at six breaths per minute, and then measuring the difference between the maximum and minimum heart rate, is the most practical method currently available. For research purposes either this method or the standard deviation method during quiet breathing for 5 min, should be used.Key words: Diabetes mellitus, autonomic neuropathy, R-R interval variation, tests of autonomic function Beat-to-beat (R-R interval) variation in heart rate has been recognised for many years, but it was only in 1973 that its use as a measure of the integrity of the autonomic nervous system was first described [1]. Wheeler and Watkins [1] showed that beat-to-beat heart rate variation during deep breathing, measured with a heart rate monitor, was diminished in some diabetics and attributed this to vagal neuropathy since atropine, but not propranolol, abolished the

Power spectral analysis (PSA) of heart-rate variations has recently proved a useful tool in evaluating cardiovascular autonomic activity. It offers the possibility of examining both the functioning of parasympathetic and sympathetic pathways through breakdown into two frequency bands, and of their effects on heart-rate cyclic variability. We applied an autoregressive model for PSA to study overall autonomic tone in 20 male age-matched control subjects and 53 insulin-dependent (type I) diabetic subjects, subdivided into three groups of 20, 15, and 18, each group presenting different degrees of autonomic involvement. We found that: 1) power spectrum density (PSD) values at high-frequency bands (parasympathetic dependent) were similar in diabetic subjects without cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) and in control subjects, but differed significantly from diabetic subjects with mild CAN and severe CAN, both standing and lying; 2) PSD values at low frequency (mainly sympathetic dependent) were similar, or slightly different, in diabetic subjects without CAN and in control subjects, but differed significantly from diabetic subjects with mild and severe CAN, both standing and lying; 3) as an expression of parasympathetic versus sympathetic coherence, correlations, both standing and lying, existed between PSD values at low- and high-frequency bands in control and diabetic subjects without CAN, but not in diabetic subjects with CAN; and 4) different degrees of correlation characterized the PSD values of high and low frequencies versus traditional cardiovascular test values in the diabetic subjects. The best correlation was between PSD low-frequency values and the lying-to-standing maneuver.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)