The 5′ untranslated region of poliovirus RNA has been reported to possess two functional elements: (i) the 5′ proximal 88 nucleotides form a cloverleaf structure implicated in positive‐strand RNA synthesis during viral replication, and (ii) nucleotides 134 to at least 556 function as a highly structured internal ribosome entry segment (IRES) during cap‐independent, internal initiation of translation. We show here that the IRES itself is bifunctional and contains sequences necessary for viral RNA synthesis per se. For this purpose, we used a dicistronic poliovirus RNA in which the translation of the viral non‐structural (replication) proteins is uncoupled from the poliovirus IRES. In this system, RNA synthesis is readily detectable in transfected cells, even when the poliovirus IRES is inactivated by point mutation. However, deletion of the major part of the poliovirus IRES renders viral‐specific RNA synthesis undetectable. Using the same system, we show that a three nucleotide deletion at position 500 in the 5′ untranslated region drastically affects both translation efficiency and RNA synthesis. Furthermore, disruption of the secondary structure of the IRES around nucleotide 343 has minimal effects on IRES function, but dramatically reduces viral RNA replication. Taken together, these results provide direct evidence that sequences essential for viral RNA synthesis are located in the 3′ region of the poliovirus IRES.

Poliovirus and human rhinovirus 2A proteinases are known to stimulate translation initiation on the cognate viral Internal Ribosome Entry Segments (IRESes). The molecular mechanism of this translational transactivation was investigated in vitro using dicistronic mRNAs containing picornaviral IRESes as the intercistronic spacer and purified human rhinovirus type 2 and coxsackievirus B4 2A proteinases. The stimulation achieved on the HRV2 IRES in the presence of the cognate 2A proteinase at 1 microgram/ml was twofold; the maximum stimulation at 100 micrograms/ml was fivefold. The IRESes and proteinases from rhino- and enteroviruses were interchangeable; however, stimulation of translation initiation on a cardiovirus IRES by these proteinases was minimal. Studies using an inhibitor or a mutant 2A proteinase demonstrated that translation stimulation requires 2A-mediated enzymatic conversion of some cellular component(s). The HRV2 2A proteinase also stimulated translation initiation on full-length viral RNA, suggesting that 2A proteinase-mediated stimulation of IRES-driven translation has a physiological role.